@inproceedings{steele-2026-annotation,
title = "Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in {L}o{RA} Fine-Tuning",
author = "Steele, Brady",
editor = "T.Y.S.S., Santosh and
Rodriguez, Juan Diego and
de Gibert, Ona",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics ({ACL} 2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.11/",
pages = "129--141",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-393-7",
abstract = "Annotator disagreement on tasks like natural languageinference (NLI) reflects genuine linguistic ambiguity,yet most fine-tuning recipes treat every example as equallylearnable.We ask whether this external signal of ambiguity predicts*per-example* learning dynamics under LoRA, the most widelyused parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, and find that it does.Correlating annotation entropy (from ChaosNLI{'}s 100 labels perexample) with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC)on SNLI and MNLI, the correlation is positive in all 25conditions tested (Spearman $\rho {=} 0.06$-0.43), withdecoder-only models showing stronger correlations thanencoders at matched LoRA rank.More strikingly, under LoRA contested examples exhibit*un-learning*: their gold-label loss *increases*during training, a pattern that is largely absent underfull fine-tuning and IA$^3$ in the encoder setting wherematched comparisons are available, and that we also observeunder LoRA on two decoder-only models.The effect survives partial-correlation controls andreplicates across seeds and datasets.A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistentwith these findings."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="steele-2026-annotation">
<titleInfo>
<title>Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Brady</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Steele</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Santosh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">T.Y.S.S.</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Juan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Diego</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rodriguez</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ona</namePart>
<namePart type="family">de Gibert</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, United States</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-393-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Annotator disagreement on tasks like natural languageinference (NLI) reflects genuine linguistic ambiguity,yet most fine-tuning recipes treat every example as equallylearnable.We ask whether this external signal of ambiguity predicts*per-example* learning dynamics under LoRA, the most widelyused parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, and find that it does.Correlating annotation entropy (from ChaosNLI’s 100 labels perexample) with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC)on SNLI and MNLI, the correlation is positive in all 25conditions tested (Spearman ρ = 0.06-0.43), withdecoder-only models showing stronger correlations thanencoders at matched LoRA rank.More strikingly, under LoRA contested examples exhibit*un-learning*: their gold-label loss *increases*during training, a pattern that is largely absent underfull fine-tuning and IA³ in the encoder setting wherematched comparisons are available, and that we also observeunder LoRA on two decoder-only models.The effect survives partial-correlation controls andreplicates across seeds and datasets.A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistentwith these findings.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">steele-2026-annotation</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.11/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>129</start>
<end>141</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning
%A Steele, Brady
%Y T.Y.S.S., Santosh
%Y Rodriguez, Juan Diego
%Y de Gibert, Ona
%S Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, United States
%@ 979-8-89176-393-7
%F steele-2026-annotation
%X Annotator disagreement on tasks like natural languageinference (NLI) reflects genuine linguistic ambiguity,yet most fine-tuning recipes treat every example as equallylearnable.We ask whether this external signal of ambiguity predicts*per-example* learning dynamics under LoRA, the most widelyused parameter-efficient fine-tuning method, and find that it does.Correlating annotation entropy (from ChaosNLI’s 100 labels perexample) with per-example area under the loss curve (AULC)on SNLI and MNLI, the correlation is positive in all 25conditions tested (Spearman ρ = 0.06-0.43), withdecoder-only models showing stronger correlations thanencoders at matched LoRA rank.More strikingly, under LoRA contested examples exhibit*un-learning*: their gold-label loss *increases*during training, a pattern that is largely absent underfull fine-tuning and IA³ in the encoder setting wherematched comparisons are available, and that we also observeunder LoRA on two decoder-only models.The effect survives partial-correlation controls andreplicates across seeds and datasets.A preliminary noise-injection experiment is consistentwith these findings.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.11/
%P 129-141
Markdown (Informal)
[Annotation Entropy Predicts Per-Example Learning Dynamics in LoRA Fine-Tuning](https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.11/) (Steele, ACL 2026)
ACL