@inproceedings{datta-baitalik-2026-confidence,
title = "Confidence as a Tie-Breaker: Reassessing Multilingual Hedging Bias in {LLM}-as-a-Judge Evaluation",
author = "Datta, Rajashik and
Baitalik, Sanjan",
editor = "T.Y.S.S., Santosh and
Rodriguez, Juan Diego and
de Gibert, Ona",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics ({ACL} 2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, United States",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.33/",
pages = "393--402",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-393-7",
abstract = "LLM judges are often used to score generated answers, but their decisions may be affected by surface style rather than semantic correctness. We introduce PolyJudge-Uncertain, a controlled benchmark for studying multilingual hedging effects in LLM-as-a-judge evaluation. The benchmark contains 5,120 short factual QA instances across English, Hindi, Hinglish, and Bengali, balancing assertive versus hedged style and correct versus incorrect answers. A small pilot suggested a large pointwise penalty against hedged answers. After repairing multilingual templates and adding quality-control checks, this pointwise effect largely disappears: final pointwise accuracy is 99.8{\%}, with no meaningful assertive-hedged gap. The robust remaining effect is pairwise: when two answers are equally correct and differ only in style, the judge prefers the assertive answer in 1,276 of 1,280 cases. We interpret this as a protocol- and task-specific assertiveness preference, not as a universal bias against hedging. Our findings highlight benchmark auditing as a central requirement for multilingual judge-bias research."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="datta-baitalik-2026-confidence">
<titleInfo>
<title>Confidence as a Tie-Breaker: Reassessing Multilingual Hedging Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rajashik</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Datta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Baitalik</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Santosh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">T.Y.S.S.</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Juan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Diego</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rodriguez</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ona</namePart>
<namePart type="family">de Gibert</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, United States</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-393-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>LLM judges are often used to score generated answers, but their decisions may be affected by surface style rather than semantic correctness. We introduce PolyJudge-Uncertain, a controlled benchmark for studying multilingual hedging effects in LLM-as-a-judge evaluation. The benchmark contains 5,120 short factual QA instances across English, Hindi, Hinglish, and Bengali, balancing assertive versus hedged style and correct versus incorrect answers. A small pilot suggested a large pointwise penalty against hedged answers. After repairing multilingual templates and adding quality-control checks, this pointwise effect largely disappears: final pointwise accuracy is 99.8%, with no meaningful assertive-hedged gap. The robust remaining effect is pairwise: when two answers are equally correct and differ only in style, the judge prefers the assertive answer in 1,276 of 1,280 cases. We interpret this as a protocol- and task-specific assertiveness preference, not as a universal bias against hedging. Our findings highlight benchmark auditing as a central requirement for multilingual judge-bias research.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">datta-baitalik-2026-confidence</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.33/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>393</start>
<end>402</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Confidence as a Tie-Breaker: Reassessing Multilingual Hedging Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation
%A Datta, Rajashik
%A Baitalik, Sanjan
%Y T.Y.S.S., Santosh
%Y Rodriguez, Juan Diego
%Y de Gibert, Ona
%S Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, United States
%@ 979-8-89176-393-7
%F datta-baitalik-2026-confidence
%X LLM judges are often used to score generated answers, but their decisions may be affected by surface style rather than semantic correctness. We introduce PolyJudge-Uncertain, a controlled benchmark for studying multilingual hedging effects in LLM-as-a-judge evaluation. The benchmark contains 5,120 short factual QA instances across English, Hindi, Hinglish, and Bengali, balancing assertive versus hedged style and correct versus incorrect answers. A small pilot suggested a large pointwise penalty against hedged answers. After repairing multilingual templates and adding quality-control checks, this pointwise effect largely disappears: final pointwise accuracy is 99.8%, with no meaningful assertive-hedged gap. The robust remaining effect is pairwise: when two answers are equally correct and differ only in style, the judge prefers the assertive answer in 1,276 of 1,280 cases. We interpret this as a protocol- and task-specific assertiveness preference, not as a universal bias against hedging. Our findings highlight benchmark auditing as a central requirement for multilingual judge-bias research.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.33/
%P 393-402
Markdown (Informal)
[Confidence as a Tie-Breaker: Reassessing Multilingual Hedging Bias in LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation](https://aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.33/) (Datta & Baitalik, ACL 2026)
ACL