Assessing the Reliability and Construct Representation of LLM-based Language Proficiency Scores

Langdon Holmes, Scott Andrew Crossley, Joon Suh Choi, Wesley Morris


Abstract
We used confirmatory factor analysis to assess the reliability and construct representation of an LLM-based measurement instrument of language proficiency. LLMs were at least as reliable as human raters and loaded onto the same underlying factor, though analyses indicated a less than perfect alignment between LLM and human raters.
Anthology ID:
2026.aimecon-main.60
Volume:
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Full Papers
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Editors:
Joshua Wilson, Christopher Ormerod, Magdalen Beiting-Parrish
Venue:
AIME-Con
SIG:
Publisher:
National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)
Note:
Pages:
534–542
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-main.60/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Langdon Holmes, Scott Andrew Crossley, Joon Suh Choi, and Wesley Morris. 2026. Assessing the Reliability and Construct Representation of LLM-based Language Proficiency Scores. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Full Papers, pages 534–542, Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
Cite (Informal):
Assessing the Reliability and Construct Representation of LLM-based Language Proficiency Scores (Holmes et al., AIME-Con 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-main.60.pdf