Can LLMs detect item flaws in the questions they have generated?

Guher Gorgun


Abstract
As LLMs increasingly streamline item generation, ensuring the quality of their outputs remains a critical challenge. This study examines whether a multi-agent system can serve as an automated judge to detect and revise flaws in AI-generated educational assessment items, such as ambiguity, bias, or content misalignment.
Anthology ID:
2026.aimecon-sessions.31
Volume:
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Coordinated Session Papers
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Editors:
Joshua Wilson, Christopher Ormerod, Magdalen Beiting-Parrish
Venue:
AIME-Con
SIG:
Publisher:
National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)
Note:
Pages:
284–290
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-sessions.31/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Guher Gorgun. 2026. Can LLMs detect item flaws in the questions they have generated?. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Coordinated Session Papers, pages 284–290, Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
Cite (Informal):
Can LLMs detect item flaws in the questions they have generated? (Gorgun, AIME-Con 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-sessions.31.pdf