Evaluating Multi-Phase and Granular Strategies for Evidence-Anchored Automated Scoring

Alessia Marigo, Laura Wright, Linda Malkin, Xin Xie


Abstract
This study evaluates few-shot large language models (LLMs) on middle-school geoscience responses (N=86 responses × 11 indicators), separating presence agreement from extract agreement. Joint prompting and annotation-like rubric guidance plus examples yield the clearest gains; lengthy rubric rewriting and clause-level parsing do not reliably improve extract alignment.
Anthology ID:
2026.aimecon-wip.3
Volume:
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Works in Progress
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Editors:
Joshua Wilson, Christopher Ormerod, Magdalen Beiting-Parrish
Venue:
AIME-Con
SIG:
Publisher:
National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)
Note:
Pages:
17–23
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-wip.3/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Alessia Marigo, Laura Wright, Linda Malkin, and Xin Xie. 2026. Evaluating Multi-Phase and Granular Strategies for Evidence-Anchored Automated Scoring. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Works in Progress, pages 17–23, Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
Cite (Informal):
Evaluating Multi-Phase and Granular Strategies for Evidence-Anchored Automated Scoring (Marigo et al., AIME-Con 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aimecon-wip.3.pdf