@inproceedings{bylinina-2026-augustinian,
title = "Augustinian {B}aby{LM}: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model",
author = "Bylinina, Lisa",
editor = "Choshen, Leshem and
Cotterell, Ryan and
Gul, Mustafa Omer and
Jumelet, Jaap and
Linzen, Tal and
Mueller, Aaron and
Salhan, Suchir and
Shah, Raj Sanjay and
Warstadt, Alex and
Wilcox, Ethan Gotlieb",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second {B}aby{LM} Workshop",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.babylm-main.13/",
pages = "165--178",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-475-0",
abstract = "A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever `banana' means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine{'}s picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens receive embeddings derived from the image regions they label; other tokens start random.\par Visual initialization leaves a measurable imprint that lasts until the end of training. At the same time, the effect remains invisible under most BabyLM benchmarks, which probe abstract grammatical knowledge: visual initialization does not affect performance there. The only zero-shot exception is object-property knowledge (COMPS), where seeding helps in every configuration. To follow up on this result, I build a corpus-tailored version of the Visual-Property Swap benchmark, which tests color, material, size, and shape knowledge, with per-item training frequency and seeded status. Here, vision-seeded models have a persistent, seed-replicated advantage, confined to the seeded words. As a causal test, I show that synthetic grounding of previously unseeded words transfers the advantage to exactly those words.\par Function words and abstract vocabulary also receive strong visual seeds and retain them throughout training, and the training objective draws on them: held-out mask-prediction loss falls for these words in every seed. However, no benchmark I run registers this. What evaluation would pick this up remains an open question."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="bylinina-2026-augustinian">
<titleInfo>
<title>Augustinian BabyLM: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lisa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bylinina</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Leshem</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Choshen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ryan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Cotterell</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mustafa</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Omer</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gul</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jaap</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jumelet</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Linzen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Aaron</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mueller</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Suchir</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Salhan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Raj</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Sanjay</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shah</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alex</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Warstadt</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ethan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Gotlieb</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wilcox</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-475-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever ‘banana’ means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine’s picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens receive embeddings derived from the image regions they label; other tokens start random.\par Visual initialization leaves a measurable imprint that lasts until the end of training. At the same time, the effect remains invisible under most BabyLM benchmarks, which probe abstract grammatical knowledge: visual initialization does not affect performance there. The only zero-shot exception is object-property knowledge (COMPS), where seeding helps in every configuration. To follow up on this result, I build a corpus-tailored version of the Visual-Property Swap benchmark, which tests color, material, size, and shape knowledge, with per-item training frequency and seeded status. Here, vision-seeded models have a persistent, seed-replicated advantage, confined to the seeded words. As a causal test, I show that synthetic grounding of previously unseeded words transfers the advantage to exactly those words.\par Function words and abstract vocabulary also receive strong visual seeds and retain them throughout training, and the training objective draws on them: held-out mask-prediction loss falls for these words in every seed. However, no benchmark I run registers this. What evaluation would pick this up remains an open question.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">bylinina-2026-augustinian</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.babylm-main.13/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>165</start>
<end>178</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Augustinian BabyLM: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model
%A Bylinina, Lisa
%Y Choshen, Leshem
%Y Cotterell, Ryan
%Y Gul, Mustafa Omer
%Y Jumelet, Jaap
%Y Linzen, Tal
%Y Mueller, Aaron
%Y Salhan, Suchir
%Y Shah, Raj Sanjay
%Y Warstadt, Alex
%Y Wilcox, Ethan Gotlieb
%S Proceedings of the Second BabyLM Workshop
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-475-0
%F bylinina-2026-augustinian
%X A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever ‘banana’ means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine’s picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens receive embeddings derived from the image regions they label; other tokens start random.\par Visual initialization leaves a measurable imprint that lasts until the end of training. At the same time, the effect remains invisible under most BabyLM benchmarks, which probe abstract grammatical knowledge: visual initialization does not affect performance there. The only zero-shot exception is object-property knowledge (COMPS), where seeding helps in every configuration. To follow up on this result, I build a corpus-tailored version of the Visual-Property Swap benchmark, which tests color, material, size, and shape knowledge, with per-item training frequency and seeded status. Here, vision-seeded models have a persistent, seed-replicated advantage, confined to the seeded words. As a causal test, I show that synthetic grounding of previously unseeded words transfers the advantage to exactly those words.\par Function words and abstract vocabulary also receive strong visual seeds and retain them throughout training, and the training objective draws on them: held-out mask-prediction loss falls for these words in every seed. However, no benchmark I run registers this. What evaluation would pick this up remains an open question.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.babylm-main.13/
%P 165-178
Markdown (Informal)
[Augustinian BabyLM: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model](https://aclanthology.org/2026.babylm-main.13/) (Bylinina, BabyLM 2026)
ACL