Are Latent Reasoning Tokens Unnecessary for Model Performance?

Austin Long, Colin Paterson, Jing Xu


Abstract
Training large language models to perform latent reasoning may improve performance, but the lack of legible reasoning poses challenges for model interpretability and safety assurance. This challenge has motivated interpretability research that aims to characterise the functional role of latent reasoning tokens. Some studies indicate that latent reasoning tokens are effective, whereas other work suggests that these tokens are under-utilised. In this paper, we consider the tension between existing findings by reproducing prior work which shows that some latent reasoning tokens are not necessary. Two interesting observations emerge from our experiments. First, we find that latent reasoning models often generate redundant tokens due to the fixed token budgets. Second, we observe that explicit reasoning models fine-tuned on gold reasoning traces may copy the result of the most recent reasoning step when generating an answer.
Anthology ID:
2026.blackboxnlp-1.70
Volume:
Proceedings of the 9th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Dana Arad, Yonatan Belinkov, Hanjie Chen, Nils Feldhus, Aaron Mueller, Hosein Mohebbi, Gabriele Sarti, Martin Tutek
Venues:
BlackboxNLP | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
1223–1232
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.70/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Austin Long, Colin Paterson, and Jing Xu. 2026. Are Latent Reasoning Tokens Unnecessary for Model Performance?. In Proceedings of the 9th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 1223–1232, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Are Latent Reasoning Tokens Unnecessary for Model Performance? (Long et al., BlackboxNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.70.pdf