@inproceedings{suthaharan-etal-2026-inside,
title = "Inside self-reflection: the geometry in multi-dimensional scoring of metacognitive structure",
author = "Suthaharan, Praveen and
Corlett, Philip Robert and
Ang, Yuen-Siang",
editor = "Arad, Dana and
Belinkov, Yonatan and
Chen, Hanjie and
Feldhus, Nils and
Mueller, Aaron and
Mohebbi, Hosein and
Sarti, Gabriele and
Tutek, Martin",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 9th {B}lackbox{NLP} Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for {NLP}",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.9/",
pages = "122--135",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-476-7",
abstract = "Large language models (LLMs) increasingly score open-ended text along multidimensional rubrics, yet strong score recoverability need not imply that a dimension is distinct or relevant to downstream decisions. We examine how Gemma-2-2B represents five metacognitive-prompting dimensions in self-reflections from 486 participants on a probabilistic reversal learning task. Linear probes recover all dimensions across depth, with depth gradients ordered by the rubric hierarchy. Evaluation is strongly decoded but has the weakest coupling to independently measured task markers. Under the primary five-occurrence token filter, Evaluation-related vocabulary shows no detectable association with switching, whereas the negative Final Decision association is stable across frequency thresholds. Activation patching yields oppositely signed point estimates in a fixed linear win{--}switch readout when the Final Decision{--}Evaluation matched-pair contrast is injected in each direction, although no layer survives correction across the full sweep. These findings show that decodability alone is insufficient evidence for weighting rubric dimensions in downstream decisions."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="suthaharan-etal-2026-inside">
<titleInfo>
<title>Inside self-reflection: the geometry in multi-dimensional scoring of metacognitive structure</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Praveen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Suthaharan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philip</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Robert</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Corlett</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuen-Siang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 9th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Arad</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yonatan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Belinkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hanjie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nils</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Feldhus</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Aaron</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mueller</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hosein</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mohebbi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gabriele</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sarti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Martin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tutek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-476-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Large language models (LLMs) increasingly score open-ended text along multidimensional rubrics, yet strong score recoverability need not imply that a dimension is distinct or relevant to downstream decisions. We examine how Gemma-2-2B represents five metacognitive-prompting dimensions in self-reflections from 486 participants on a probabilistic reversal learning task. Linear probes recover all dimensions across depth, with depth gradients ordered by the rubric hierarchy. Evaluation is strongly decoded but has the weakest coupling to independently measured task markers. Under the primary five-occurrence token filter, Evaluation-related vocabulary shows no detectable association with switching, whereas the negative Final Decision association is stable across frequency thresholds. Activation patching yields oppositely signed point estimates in a fixed linear win–switch readout when the Final Decision–Evaluation matched-pair contrast is injected in each direction, although no layer survives correction across the full sweep. These findings show that decodability alone is insufficient evidence for weighting rubric dimensions in downstream decisions.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">suthaharan-etal-2026-inside</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.9/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>122</start>
<end>135</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Inside self-reflection: the geometry in multi-dimensional scoring of metacognitive structure
%A Suthaharan, Praveen
%A Corlett, Philip Robert
%A Ang, Yuen-Siang
%Y Arad, Dana
%Y Belinkov, Yonatan
%Y Chen, Hanjie
%Y Feldhus, Nils
%Y Mueller, Aaron
%Y Mohebbi, Hosein
%Y Sarti, Gabriele
%Y Tutek, Martin
%S Proceedings of the 9th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-476-7
%F suthaharan-etal-2026-inside
%X Large language models (LLMs) increasingly score open-ended text along multidimensional rubrics, yet strong score recoverability need not imply that a dimension is distinct or relevant to downstream decisions. We examine how Gemma-2-2B represents five metacognitive-prompting dimensions in self-reflections from 486 participants on a probabilistic reversal learning task. Linear probes recover all dimensions across depth, with depth gradients ordered by the rubric hierarchy. Evaluation is strongly decoded but has the weakest coupling to independently measured task markers. Under the primary five-occurrence token filter, Evaluation-related vocabulary shows no detectable association with switching, whereas the negative Final Decision association is stable across frequency thresholds. Activation patching yields oppositely signed point estimates in a fixed linear win–switch readout when the Final Decision–Evaluation matched-pair contrast is injected in each direction, although no layer survives correction across the full sweep. These findings show that decodability alone is insufficient evidence for weighting rubric dimensions in downstream decisions.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.9/
%P 122-135
Markdown (Informal)
[Inside self-reflection: the geometry in multi-dimensional scoring of metacognitive structure](https://aclanthology.org/2026.blackboxnlp-1.9/) (Suthaharan et al., BlackboxNLP 2026)
ACL