<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="baggio-murphy-2026-referential">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>On the Referential Capacity of Language Models: An Internalist Rejoinder to Mandelkern Linzen</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Giosuè</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Baggio</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Elliot</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Murphy</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2026-09</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Computational Linguistics</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <issuance>continuing</issuance>
            <publisher>MIT Press</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, MA</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
        <genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Mandelkern and Linzen (2024) argue that words generated by language models (LMs) are linked to causal histories of use within human linguistic communities, and ultimately to their referents. Therefore, LMs’ words refer. We qualify Mandelkern and Linzen’s claim as applicable to a narrow class of expressions. Thus qualified, the claim is valid and motivated by the need to evaluate LMs’ outputs for relevance and truth. Next, we discuss the actual scope of their claim, and we conclude that the bounds of sense and reference in LMs are more restricted than in humans. We close with some considerations on the status of LMs as members of human linguistic communities.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">baggio-murphy-2026-referential</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1162/coli.a.601</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.cl-3.9/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2026-09</date>
        <detail type="volume"><number>52</number></detail>
        <detail type="issue"><number>3</number></detail>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>1243</start>
            <end>1252</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Journal Article
%T On the Referential Capacity of Language Models: An Internalist Rejoinder to Mandelkern Linzen
%A Baggio, Giosuè
%A Murphy, Elliot
%J Computational Linguistics
%D 2026
%8 September
%V 52
%N 3
%I MIT Press
%C Cambridge, MA
%F baggio-murphy-2026-referential
%X Mandelkern and Linzen (2024) argue that words generated by language models (LMs) are linked to causal histories of use within human linguistic communities, and ultimately to their referents. Therefore, LMs’ words refer. We qualify Mandelkern and Linzen’s claim as applicable to a narrow class of expressions. Thus qualified, the claim is valid and motivated by the need to evaluate LMs’ outputs for relevance and truth. Next, we discuss the actual scope of their claim, and we conclude that the bounds of sense and reference in LMs are more restricted than in humans. We close with some considerations on the status of LMs as members of human linguistic communities.
%R 10.1162/coli.a.601
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.cl-3.9/
%U https://doi.org/10.1162/coli.a.601
%P 1243-1252

Markdown (Informal)

[On the Referential Capacity of Language Models: An Internalist Rejoinder to Mandelkern Linzen](https://aclanthology.org/2026.cl-3.9/) (Baggio & Murphy, CL 2026)

• On the Referential Capacity of Language Models: An Internalist Rejoinder to Mandelkern Linzen (Baggio & Murphy, CL 2026)

ACL

• Giosuè Baggio and Elliot Murphy. 2026. On the Referential Capacity of Language Models: An Internalist Rejoinder to Mandelkern Linzen. Computational Linguistics, 52(3):1243–1252.