@inproceedings{novotney-etal-2026-judge,
title = "Judge, Don{'}t Write: Scaling Golden Data Generation via Psychometric Standard-Setting",
author = "Novotney, Scott and
Yin, Youbing and
Babinsky, Erin",
editor = "Atanasova, Pepa and
Haffari, Gholamreza and
Wang, Minghan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-industry.162/",
pages = "2751--2761",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-460-6",
abstract = "Human-written references are typically treated as the upper-bound gold standard for fine-tuning and evaluation, but writing them is an inefficient use of subject-matter expert (SME) time. To best use limited SME attention, we apply psychometric standard-setting to discover acceptance criteria for GenAI applications. These acceptance boundaries are themselves useful for calibrating an LLM-as-a-judge, model tuning, and defensible production monitoring. We report a case study on summarization across two domains at a large US financial institution. While summarization is a classic GenAI use case, what counts as acceptable differs significantly across domains. 25 SMEs across three panels produced 2,500+ judgments and yielded calibrated thresholds in an estimated 10x less SME time than the standard playbook of writing golden reference (goldens) directly. In both domains, LLM-generated goldens are preferred over SME-written ones {\textasciitilde}80{\%} of the time. Limited SME attention is best used to judge candidate goldens rather than write them."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="novotney-etal-2026-judge">
<titleInfo>
<title>Judge, Don’t Write: Scaling Golden Data Generation via Psychometric Standard-Setting</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Scott</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Novotney</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Youbing</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Erin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Babinsky</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pepa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Atanasova</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gholamreza</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Haffari</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Minghan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-460-6</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Human-written references are typically treated as the upper-bound gold standard for fine-tuning and evaluation, but writing them is an inefficient use of subject-matter expert (SME) time. To best use limited SME attention, we apply psychometric standard-setting to discover acceptance criteria for GenAI applications. These acceptance boundaries are themselves useful for calibrating an LLM-as-a-judge, model tuning, and defensible production monitoring. We report a case study on summarization across two domains at a large US financial institution. While summarization is a classic GenAI use case, what counts as acceptable differs significantly across domains. 25 SMEs across three panels produced 2,500+ judgments and yielded calibrated thresholds in an estimated 10x less SME time than the standard playbook of writing golden reference (goldens) directly. In both domains, LLM-generated goldens are preferred over SME-written ones ~80% of the time. Limited SME attention is best used to judge candidate goldens rather than write them.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">novotney-etal-2026-judge</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-industry.162/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>2751</start>
<end>2761</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Judge, Don’t Write: Scaling Golden Data Generation via Psychometric Standard-Setting
%A Novotney, Scott
%A Yin, Youbing
%A Babinsky, Erin
%Y Atanasova, Pepa
%Y Haffari, Gholamreza
%Y Wang, Minghan
%S Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Industry Track
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-460-6
%F novotney-etal-2026-judge
%X Human-written references are typically treated as the upper-bound gold standard for fine-tuning and evaluation, but writing them is an inefficient use of subject-matter expert (SME) time. To best use limited SME attention, we apply psychometric standard-setting to discover acceptance criteria for GenAI applications. These acceptance boundaries are themselves useful for calibrating an LLM-as-a-judge, model tuning, and defensible production monitoring. We report a case study on summarization across two domains at a large US financial institution. While summarization is a classic GenAI use case, what counts as acceptable differs significantly across domains. 25 SMEs across three panels produced 2,500+ judgments and yielded calibrated thresholds in an estimated 10x less SME time than the standard playbook of writing golden reference (goldens) directly. In both domains, LLM-generated goldens are preferred over SME-written ones ~80% of the time. Limited SME attention is best used to judge candidate goldens rather than write them.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-industry.162/
%P 2751-2761
Markdown (Informal)
[Judge, Don’t Write: Scaling Golden Data Generation via Psychometric Standard-Setting](https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-industry.162/) (Novotney et al., EMNLP 2026)
ACL