M-QUEST - Meme Question-Understanding Evaluation on Semantics and Toxicity

Stefano De Giorgis, Ting-Chih Chen, Filip Ilievski


Abstract
Internet memes are a powerful form of online communication, yet their multimodal nature and reliance on commonsense and cultural knowledge make automated toxicity detection challenging. Prior work has studied individual dimensions of memes: textual content via optical character recognition, visual content via object recognition, and toxicity via hate speech detection, but lacks a unified architecture that formally identifies the semantic dimensions contributing to meme toxicity. We present three contributions: (1) a semantic framework identifying the dimensions necessary for meme interpretation; (2) a corresponding benchmark, M-QUEST, of 609 question-answer pairs for 307 memes, generated via a semi-automatic process grounded in the framework; and (3) an empirical evaluation of 12 VLMs on M-QUEST. The results show that the instruction-tuned models with reasoning capabilities significantly outperform others, whereas pragmatic inference remains challenging across all models.
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-main.164
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
3759–3784
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.164/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Stefano De Giorgis, Ting-Chih Chen, and Filip Ilievski. 2026. M-QUEST - Meme Question-Understanding Evaluation on Semantics and Toxicity. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3759–3784, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
M-QUEST - Meme Question-Understanding Evaluation on Semantics and Toxicity (De Giorgis et al., EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.164.pdf