When Does Reasoning Age? Survival Analysis of Step-Level Error Hazard in LLM Chains

Raj Firke, Rajeswari Kannan


Abstract
We apply survival analysis to study how the probability of reasoning error evolves across steps in LLM chain-of-thought inference. Analyzing 18,969 chains across five benchmarks and seven models (3B–70B) under greedy decoding, we discover a near-universal aging effect—the conditional probability of reasoning error increasing with step depth—as measured by the Weibull shape parameter 𝜌 > 1 (indicating increasing hazard) in 34 of 35 dataset–model cells (binomial p = 10-9), with task-dependent magnitude ranging from  ̄𝜌 = 1.35 (multi-domain QA) to  ̄𝜌 = 2.36 (logical deduction). This finding is robust to informative censoring (IPCW adjustment: 34/35 cells retain 𝜌 > 1) and unobserved problem-level heterogeneity (shared frailty 𝜃 ≈ 0: 34/35 cells retain 𝜌 > 1). Compositional fan-in—the number of prior-step outputs consumed per step—shows a large but statistically suggestive rank correlation with aging magnitude (Spearman 𝜌s = 0.90, exact permutation p = 0.083, N = 5). We show that a survivorship bias masks these dynamics when raw error rates are used instead of the conditional hazard function. Held-out verification experiments confirm that late-weighted allocation (motivated by the aging finding) catches 94% of errors vs. 23% uniform on the strongest-aging task at budget K=1, while hazard-proportional allocation outperforms both baselines on moderately aging tasks (GSM8K, MathQA) at all budget levels. Our framework requires no training and provides actionable diagnostics for verification allocation.
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-main.1976
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
44972–44988
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.1976/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Raj Firke and Rajeswari Kannan. 2026. When Does Reasoning Age? Survival Analysis of Step-Level Error Hazard in LLM Chains. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 44972–44988, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
When Does Reasoning Age? Survival Analysis of Step-Level Error Hazard in LLM Chains (Firke & Kannan, EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.1976.pdf