The Analyst in the Prompt: Role, Retrieval, and Memory Biases in LLM Financial Analysis

Ahmed Asaad, Amr Mohamed, Yang Zhang, Omneya Abdelsalam


Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) use persistent user context such as memory, profiles, and role prompts. This enables personalization, but can destabilize evidence-based judgment: the same evidence may yield different conclusions under different user contexts. Finance offers a high-stakes long-document setting where evidence reading is central. We test this on 3,575 SEC filings across twelve models. By comparing persona-conditioned retrieval, neutral retrieval, and memory-framed context, we find that bias comes from how models interpret identical evidence under role-style context, not from which evidence they retrieve. As mitigation, user-memory framing of the same mindset and dual-output scoring reduce the effect, with model-specific effectiveness across models.
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-main.2268
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
51572–51597
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2268/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Ahmed Asaad, Amr Mohamed, Yang Zhang, and Omneya Abdelsalam. 2026. The Analyst in the Prompt: Role, Retrieval, and Memory Biases in LLM Financial Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 51572–51597, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
The Analyst in the Prompt: Role, Retrieval, and Memory Biases in LLM Financial Analysis (Asaad et al., EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2268.pdf