@inproceedings{wyer-etal-2026-harm,
title = "Harm Laundering in {GPT} Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations",
author = "Wyer, Sarah and
Black, Sue and
Al Moubayed, Noura",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2506/",
pages = "56960--56984",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-459-0",
abstract = "Safety evaluations for large language models rely on surface-form classifiers that report declining harm scores across model generations. We provide evidence that this methodology is systematically incomplete: explicit discriminatory content is transformed rather than removed. We call this harm laundering. Analysing 450,000 gender-directed completions across 15 models spanning GPT-2 through GPT-5 (OpenAI GPT lineage; three demographic conditions), we show that sexual violence clusters prevalent in GPT-2 women-directed output disappear by GPT-4, while men-directed completions gain positive representational territory (caregiving, emotional range, ally identity) that women-directed completions do not. The pattern is most visible at GPT-5: Topic 5 (1,997 documents) frames breast cancer as a men{'}s rights debate, while zero equivalent clusters appear in women-directed output. Three independent classifiers score this content as non-toxic. Sentiment scores invert at GPT-4: early models demean women; later models over-correct. Topic diversity in women-directed completions falls 36{\%} relative to men at the GPT-4 alignment boundary (W/M = 0.58, from 0.91 at GPT-2). REGARD representational harm disparity correlates with release date ({\ensuremath{\rho}} = +0.55, p = .034) while Detoxify does not ({\ensuremath{\rho}} = {\ensuremath{-}}0.23, p = .42): toxicity scores fall as representational harm grows. We formalise harm laundering as a three-criteria test and provide a three-stage detection protocol applicable to any generative model. Within the OpenAI GPT lineage, toxicity score reduction is not a sufficient proxy for harm reduction."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="wyer-etal-2026-harm">
<titleInfo>
<title>Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sarah</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wyer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Black</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Noura</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Al Moubayed</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-459-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Safety evaluations for large language models rely on surface-form classifiers that report declining harm scores across model generations. We provide evidence that this methodology is systematically incomplete: explicit discriminatory content is transformed rather than removed. We call this harm laundering. Analysing 450,000 gender-directed completions across 15 models spanning GPT-2 through GPT-5 (OpenAI GPT lineage; three demographic conditions), we show that sexual violence clusters prevalent in GPT-2 women-directed output disappear by GPT-4, while men-directed completions gain positive representational territory (caregiving, emotional range, ally identity) that women-directed completions do not. The pattern is most visible at GPT-5: Topic 5 (1,997 documents) frames breast cancer as a men’s rights debate, while zero equivalent clusters appear in women-directed output. Three independent classifiers score this content as non-toxic. Sentiment scores invert at GPT-4: early models demean women; later models over-correct. Topic diversity in women-directed completions falls 36% relative to men at the GPT-4 alignment boundary (W/M = 0.58, from 0.91 at GPT-2). REGARD representational harm disparity correlates with release date (\ensuremathρ = +0.55, p = .034) while Detoxify does not (\ensuremathρ = \ensuremath-0.23, p = .42): toxicity scores fall as representational harm grows. We formalise harm laundering as a three-criteria test and provide a three-stage detection protocol applicable to any generative model. Within the OpenAI GPT lineage, toxicity score reduction is not a sufficient proxy for harm reduction.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">wyer-etal-2026-harm</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2506/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>56960</start>
<end>56984</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations
%A Wyer, Sarah
%A Black, Sue
%A Al Moubayed, Noura
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-459-0
%F wyer-etal-2026-harm
%X Safety evaluations for large language models rely on surface-form classifiers that report declining harm scores across model generations. We provide evidence that this methodology is systematically incomplete: explicit discriminatory content is transformed rather than removed. We call this harm laundering. Analysing 450,000 gender-directed completions across 15 models spanning GPT-2 through GPT-5 (OpenAI GPT lineage; three demographic conditions), we show that sexual violence clusters prevalent in GPT-2 women-directed output disappear by GPT-4, while men-directed completions gain positive representational territory (caregiving, emotional range, ally identity) that women-directed completions do not. The pattern is most visible at GPT-5: Topic 5 (1,997 documents) frames breast cancer as a men’s rights debate, while zero equivalent clusters appear in women-directed output. Three independent classifiers score this content as non-toxic. Sentiment scores invert at GPT-4: early models demean women; later models over-correct. Topic diversity in women-directed completions falls 36% relative to men at the GPT-4 alignment boundary (W/M = 0.58, from 0.91 at GPT-2). REGARD representational harm disparity correlates with release date (\ensuremathρ = +0.55, p = .034) while Detoxify does not (\ensuremathρ = \ensuremath-0.23, p = .42): toxicity scores fall as representational harm grows. We formalise harm laundering as a three-criteria test and provide a three-stage detection protocol applicable to any generative model. Within the OpenAI GPT lineage, toxicity score reduction is not a sufficient proxy for harm reduction.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2506/
%P 56960-56984
Markdown (Informal)
[Harm Laundering in GPT Models: Evidence That Gender Discrimination Is Transformed Rather Than Reduced Across Safety-Trained Generations](https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.2506/) (Wyer et al., EMNLP 2026)
ACL