@inproceedings{imai-etal-2026-task,
title = "From Task Success to Productive Success: Evaluating Human-{AI} Collaboration by Quality and Cost",
author = "Imai, Saki and
Inan, Mert and
Alikhani, Malihe",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.350/",
pages = "8038--8056",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-459-0",
abstract = "AI productivity is often measured by task completion time, economic value, or improvements in outcome quality. However, these measures usually treat collaboration as a black box where they capture what output was produced, but not the interaction cost required to produce it. Motivated by economics literature, we introduce a productivity-oriented framework for evaluating human-AI collaboration as outcome quality relative to interaction cost. Across two datasets spanning four tasks, we show that: (1) sessions with identical quality ratings can differ by up to 70$\times$ in interaction cost; (2) quality-cost relationships vary by task, with some tasks rewarding extended interaction and others favoring fast convergence; (3) subjective user ratings are not reliable substitutes for productivity; and (4) productive sessions are characterized by agents probing earlier and users spending less effort repairing the interaction. By distinguishing productive success from costly success, our framework makes interactional cost visible and shows how dialogue analysis can inform the evaluation and design of AI systems. We release our code and newly collected human-AI collaboration dataset for reproducibility."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="imai-etal-2026-task">
<titleInfo>
<title>From Task Success to Productive Success: Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration by Quality and Cost</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Saki</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Imai</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mert</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Inan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Malihe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alikhani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-459-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>AI productivity is often measured by task completion time, economic value, or improvements in outcome quality. However, these measures usually treat collaboration as a black box where they capture what output was produced, but not the interaction cost required to produce it. Motivated by economics literature, we introduce a productivity-oriented framework for evaluating human-AI collaboration as outcome quality relative to interaction cost. Across two datasets spanning four tasks, we show that: (1) sessions with identical quality ratings can differ by up to 70\times in interaction cost; (2) quality-cost relationships vary by task, with some tasks rewarding extended interaction and others favoring fast convergence; (3) subjective user ratings are not reliable substitutes for productivity; and (4) productive sessions are characterized by agents probing earlier and users spending less effort repairing the interaction. By distinguishing productive success from costly success, our framework makes interactional cost visible and shows how dialogue analysis can inform the evaluation and design of AI systems. We release our code and newly collected human-AI collaboration dataset for reproducibility.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">imai-etal-2026-task</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.350/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>8038</start>
<end>8056</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T From Task Success to Productive Success: Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration by Quality and Cost
%A Imai, Saki
%A Inan, Mert
%A Alikhani, Malihe
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-459-0
%F imai-etal-2026-task
%X AI productivity is often measured by task completion time, economic value, or improvements in outcome quality. However, these measures usually treat collaboration as a black box where they capture what output was produced, but not the interaction cost required to produce it. Motivated by economics literature, we introduce a productivity-oriented framework for evaluating human-AI collaboration as outcome quality relative to interaction cost. Across two datasets spanning four tasks, we show that: (1) sessions with identical quality ratings can differ by up to 70\times in interaction cost; (2) quality-cost relationships vary by task, with some tasks rewarding extended interaction and others favoring fast convergence; (3) subjective user ratings are not reliable substitutes for productivity; and (4) productive sessions are characterized by agents probing earlier and users spending less effort repairing the interaction. By distinguishing productive success from costly success, our framework makes interactional cost visible and shows how dialogue analysis can inform the evaluation and design of AI systems. We release our code and newly collected human-AI collaboration dataset for reproducibility.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.350/
%P 8038-8056
Markdown (Informal)
[From Task Success to Productive Success: Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration by Quality and Cost](https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.350/) (Imai et al., EMNLP 2026)
ACL