ReFeedGraph: Graph-Grounded Reusable Feedback for Debate Improvement

Priya Pitre, Omkar J. Joshi, Timon Ziegenbein, Henning Wachsmuth


Abstract
Debate feedback is useful only when it explains why a side lost and how that side can revise to become more competitive. However, LLM-generated feedback often sounds polished while remaining generic and vague. We introduce ReFeedGraph, a graph-based method that turns prior debate feedback into reusable principles. It collects multi-framework judge feedback, extracts weaknesses and actionable suggestions, abstracts them into principles, and stores them in a graph. For a new debate, ReFeedGraph retrieves relevant principles and adapts them into targeted revision feedback. We evaluate the generated feedback by recording whether it improves the weaker side after rewriting. Across three existing datasets (DebateArt, Intelligence Squared, and British Parliamentary debates), ReFeedGraph outperforms direct LLM and structured-prompt baselines, producing more specific and actionable feedback that leads to winning more debates.
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-main.678
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
15621–15640
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.678/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Priya Pitre, Omkar J. Joshi, Timon Ziegenbein, and Henning Wachsmuth. 2026. ReFeedGraph: Graph-Grounded Reusable Feedback for Debate Improvement. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 15621–15640, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
ReFeedGraph: Graph-Grounded Reusable Feedback for Debate Improvement (Pitre et al., EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.678.pdf