Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication

Peter Zeng, Amie J. Paige, Weiling Li, Susan Brennan, Owen Rambow, Cameron Robert Jones


Abstract
Two recent studies (Jones et al. (2026); Zeng et al. (2026)) reach apparently contradictory conclusions about whether LVLMs can coordinate on efficient referring expressions. We control for task differences between the studies while directly comparing their prompting styles. We replicate the finding that models can coordinate efficient referring expressions when explicitly prompted to do so, suggesting that other task differences are not responsible for divergent results. However, we also find that the same models fail to infer the need for communicative efficiency from a more implicit prompt, highlighting critical differences between how humans and AI systems communicate.
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-main.704
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
16269–16285
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.704/
DOI:
10.18653/2026.emnlp-main.704
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Peter Zeng, Amie J. Paige, Weiling Li, Susan Brennan, Owen Rambow, and Cameron Robert Jones. 2026. Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 16269–16285, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication (Zeng et al., EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-main.704.pdf