Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify

Shruti Joshi, Aaron Mueller, Patrik Reizinger, Dhanya Sridhar


Abstract
Interpretability findings on large language models often fail to generalise, and causal claims can outrun the evidence. A recurring source, we suggest, is a borrowed vocabulary: interpretability inherited the words of causality — "mechanisms", "circuits", "features" — without always inheriting the bookkeeping that keeps causal claims precise. This tutorial teaches that bookkeeping for practitioners. Participants leave able to take any interpretability result and answer three questions: what claim does this method license, what would strengthen the claim, and when will it generalise?
Anthology ID:
2026.emnlp-tutorials.5
Volume:
Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Ana Marasović, Goran Glavaš
Venue:
EMNLP
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
8–9
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Shruti Joshi, Aaron Mueller, Patrik Reizinger, and Dhanya Sridhar. 2026. Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify. In Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts, pages 8–9, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify (Joshi et al., EMNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5.pdf