@inproceedings{joshi-etal-2026-causal,
title = "Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify",
author = "Joshi, Shruti and
Mueller, Aaron and
Reizinger, Patrik and
Sridhar, Dhanya",
editor = "Marasovi{\'c}, Ana and
Glava{\v{s}}, Goran",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5/",
pages = "8--9",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-463-7",
abstract = "Interpretability findings on large language models often fail to generalise, and causal claims can outrun the evidence. A recurring source, we suggest, is a borrowed vocabulary: interpretability inherited the words of causality {---} ``mechanisms'', ``circuits'', ``features'' {---} without always inheriting the bookkeeping that keeps causal claims precise. This tutorial teaches that bookkeeping for practitioners. Participants leave able to take any interpretability result and answer three questions: what claim does this method license, what would strengthen the claim, and when will it generalise?"
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="joshi-etal-2026-causal">
<titleInfo>
<title>Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shruti</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Joshi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Aaron</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mueller</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Patrik</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reizinger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dhanya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sridhar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Marasović</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Goran</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Glavaš</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-463-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Interpretability findings on large language models often fail to generalise, and causal claims can outrun the evidence. A recurring source, we suggest, is a borrowed vocabulary: interpretability inherited the words of causality — “mechanisms”, “circuits”, “features” — without always inheriting the bookkeeping that keeps causal claims precise. This tutorial teaches that bookkeeping for practitioners. Participants leave able to take any interpretability result and answer three questions: what claim does this method license, what would strengthen the claim, and when will it generalise?</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">joshi-etal-2026-causal</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>8</start>
<end>9</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify
%A Joshi, Shruti
%A Mueller, Aaron
%A Reizinger, Patrik
%A Sridhar, Dhanya
%Y Marasović, Ana
%Y Glavaš, Goran
%S Proceedings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: Tutorial Abstracts
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-463-7
%F joshi-etal-2026-causal
%X Interpretability findings on large language models often fail to generalise, and causal claims can outrun the evidence. A recurring source, we suggest, is a borrowed vocabulary: interpretability inherited the words of causality — “mechanisms”, “circuits”, “features” — without always inheriting the bookkeeping that keeps causal claims precise. This tutorial teaches that bookkeeping for practitioners. Participants leave able to take any interpretability result and answer three questions: what claim does this method license, what would strengthen the claim, and when will it generalise?
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5/
%P 8-9
Markdown (Informal)
[Causal Foundations for Interpretability: What Your Methods Actually Identify](https://aclanthology.org/2026.emnlp-tutorials.5/) (Joshi et al., EMNLP 2026)
ACL