@inproceedings{piper-jiang-2026-evaluating,
title = "Evaluating multi-modal {LLM}s on historical book illustrations",
author = "Piper, Andrew and
Jiang, Jiaming",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EMNLP} 2026",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304/",
doi = "10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.1304",
pages = "27575--27589",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-462-0",
abstract = "Historical book illustrations are culturally significant multimodal artifacts that pose distinctive challenges for computational analysis, including sparse visual cues, historical reproduction techniques, and material degradation. We present the first task-specific evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on historical book illustrations, testing five contemporary models on 1,969 children{'}s book illustrations across a range of visual labeling exercises and caption generation tasks. Frontier models performed strongly against human consensus annotations on concrete tasks, particularly illustration and setting detection, and mirrored human-level disagreement on entity, object and action identification. All model families struggled with accurate emotional intensity estimation. GPT and Gemini produced the strongest captions, with greater than 70{\%} of images exhibiting no factual errors. Finally, frontier models closely recovered human distributions at the corpus level for major visual categories suggesting their appropriateness for use in large-scale studies."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="piper-jiang-2026-evaluating">
<titleInfo>
<title>Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piper</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jiaming</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jiang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-462-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Historical book illustrations are culturally significant multimodal artifacts that pose distinctive challenges for computational analysis, including sparse visual cues, historical reproduction techniques, and material degradation. We present the first task-specific evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on historical book illustrations, testing five contemporary models on 1,969 children’s book illustrations across a range of visual labeling exercises and caption generation tasks. Frontier models performed strongly against human consensus annotations on concrete tasks, particularly illustration and setting detection, and mirrored human-level disagreement on entity, object and action identification. All model families struggled with accurate emotional intensity estimation. GPT and Gemini produced the strongest captions, with greater than 70% of images exhibiting no factual errors. Finally, frontier models closely recovered human distributions at the corpus level for major visual categories suggesting their appropriateness for use in large-scale studies.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">piper-jiang-2026-evaluating</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.1304</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>27575</start>
<end>27589</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations
%A Piper, Andrew
%A Jiang, Jiaming
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-462-0
%F piper-jiang-2026-evaluating
%X Historical book illustrations are culturally significant multimodal artifacts that pose distinctive challenges for computational analysis, including sparse visual cues, historical reproduction techniques, and material degradation. We present the first task-specific evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on historical book illustrations, testing five contemporary models on 1,969 children’s book illustrations across a range of visual labeling exercises and caption generation tasks. Frontier models performed strongly against human consensus annotations on concrete tasks, particularly illustration and setting detection, and mirrored human-level disagreement on entity, object and action identification. All model families struggled with accurate emotional intensity estimation. GPT and Gemini produced the strongest captions, with greater than 70% of images exhibiting no factual errors. Finally, frontier models closely recovered human distributions at the corpus level for major visual categories suggesting their appropriateness for use in large-scale studies.
%R 10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.1304
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.1304
%P 27575-27589
Markdown (Informal)
[Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304/) (Piper & Jiang, Findings 2026)
ACL