Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations

Andrew Piper, Jiaming Jiang


Abstract
Historical book illustrations are culturally significant multimodal artifacts that pose distinctive challenges for computational analysis, including sparse visual cues, historical reproduction techniques, and material degradation. We present the first task-specific evaluation of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on historical book illustrations, testing five contemporary models on 1,969 children’s book illustrations across a range of visual labeling exercises and caption generation tasks. Frontier models performed strongly against human consensus annotations on concrete tasks, particularly illustration and setting detection, and mirrored human-level disagreement on entity, object and action identification. All model families struggled with accurate emotional intensity estimation. GPT and Gemini produced the strongest captions, with greater than 70% of images exhibiting no factual errors. Finally, frontier models closely recovered human distributions at the corpus level for major visual categories suggesting their appropriateness for use in large-scale studies.
Anthology ID:
2026.findings-emnlp.1304
Volume:
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
Month:
October
Year:
2026
Address:
Budapest, Hungary
Editors:
Hung-Yi Lee, Sunipa Dev, Jessy Li, Desmond Elliott
Venue:
Findings
SIG:
SIGDAT
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
27575–27589
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304/
DOI:
10.18653/2026.findings-emnlp.1304
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Andrew Piper and Jiaming Jiang. 2026. Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026, pages 27575–27589, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Evaluating multi-modal LLMs on historical book illustrations (Piper & Jiang, Findings 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.1304.pdf