@inproceedings{wang-etal-2026-figmabench,
title = "{F}igma{B}ench: Evaluating Design-to-Code Generation in Real-World Handoff Scenarios",
author = "Wang, Ziyang and
Liu, Ziyang and
Yin, Xin and
Zhang, Chao and
Cui, Zhe and
Lu, Yue",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EMNLP} 2026",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.2342/",
pages = "50344--50363",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-462-0",
abstract = "Automating design-to-code translation remains a longstanding goal in software engineering. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in design-to-code tasks, existing benchmarks rely solely on screenshots, discarding the structured metadata indispensable in real-world design handoff workflows. Furthermore, current evaluation paradigms are deficient, as code-level metrics fail to account for implementation variability and visual metrics overlook fine-grained defects, while standardized assessments for responsive behaviors remain absent. To address these limitations, we introduce FigmaBench, an industrial-grade benchmark for multimodal design-to-code generation. We collect raw design files from the Figma Community and apply a multi-stage pipeline to curate 1,234 high-quality samples, each comprising high-resolution screenshots and complete JSON metadata. We further propose a comprehensive evaluation framework with four complementary metrics: visual consistency (VCS), structural layout alignment (SLA), textual and stylistic fidelity (TSF), and responsive quality score (RQS). Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover a critical \textit{fidelity-responsiveness paradox}: models achieving high visual fidelity tend to generate rigid, non-responsive code. We trace this phenomenon to a \textit{metadata trap}, where models shortcut layout reasoning by directly transcribing absolute coordinates rather than generating fluid structures. Our data and code are available at \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FigmaBench-6C84/}."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="wang-etal-2026-figmabench">
<titleInfo>
<title>FigmaBench: Evaluating Design-to-Code Generation in Real-World Handoff Scenarios</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ziyang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ziyang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chao</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zhe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Cui</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-462-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Automating design-to-code translation remains a longstanding goal in software engineering. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in design-to-code tasks, existing benchmarks rely solely on screenshots, discarding the structured metadata indispensable in real-world design handoff workflows. Furthermore, current evaluation paradigms are deficient, as code-level metrics fail to account for implementation variability and visual metrics overlook fine-grained defects, while standardized assessments for responsive behaviors remain absent. To address these limitations, we introduce FigmaBench, an industrial-grade benchmark for multimodal design-to-code generation. We collect raw design files from the Figma Community and apply a multi-stage pipeline to curate 1,234 high-quality samples, each comprising high-resolution screenshots and complete JSON metadata. We further propose a comprehensive evaluation framework with four complementary metrics: visual consistency (VCS), structural layout alignment (SLA), textual and stylistic fidelity (TSF), and responsive quality score (RQS). Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover a critical fidelity-responsiveness paradox: models achieving high visual fidelity tend to generate rigid, non-responsive code. We trace this phenomenon to a metadata trap, where models shortcut layout reasoning by directly transcribing absolute coordinates rather than generating fluid structures. Our data and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FigmaBench-6C84/.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">wang-etal-2026-figmabench</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.2342/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>50344</start>
<end>50363</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T FigmaBench: Evaluating Design-to-Code Generation in Real-World Handoff Scenarios
%A Wang, Ziyang
%A Liu, Ziyang
%A Yin, Xin
%A Zhang, Chao
%A Cui, Zhe
%A Lu, Yue
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-462-0
%F wang-etal-2026-figmabench
%X Automating design-to-code translation remains a longstanding goal in software engineering. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in design-to-code tasks, existing benchmarks rely solely on screenshots, discarding the structured metadata indispensable in real-world design handoff workflows. Furthermore, current evaluation paradigms are deficient, as code-level metrics fail to account for implementation variability and visual metrics overlook fine-grained defects, while standardized assessments for responsive behaviors remain absent. To address these limitations, we introduce FigmaBench, an industrial-grade benchmark for multimodal design-to-code generation. We collect raw design files from the Figma Community and apply a multi-stage pipeline to curate 1,234 high-quality samples, each comprising high-resolution screenshots and complete JSON metadata. We further propose a comprehensive evaluation framework with four complementary metrics: visual consistency (VCS), structural layout alignment (SLA), textual and stylistic fidelity (TSF), and responsive quality score (RQS). Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art MLLMs, we uncover a critical fidelity-responsiveness paradox: models achieving high visual fidelity tend to generate rigid, non-responsive code. We trace this phenomenon to a metadata trap, where models shortcut layout reasoning by directly transcribing absolute coordinates rather than generating fluid structures. Our data and code are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/FigmaBench-6C84/.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.2342/
%P 50344-50363
Markdown (Informal)
[FigmaBench: Evaluating Design-to-Code Generation in Real-World Handoff Scenarios](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.2342/) (Wang et al., Findings 2026)
ACL