@inproceedings{xing-etal-2026-clinicalretrial,
title = "{C}linical{R}e{T}rial: Clinical Trial Redesign with Self-Evolving Agents",
author = "Xing, Sixue and
Wu, Kerui and
Xia, Xuanye and
He, Haoyu and
Jiang, Meng and
Chen, Jintai and
Fu, Tianfan",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EMNLP} 2026",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.772/",
pages = "16296--16330",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-462-0",
abstract = "Clinical trials constitute a critical yet exceptionally challenging and costly stage of drug development ($2.6B per drug), where protocols are encoded as complex natural language documents, motivating the use of AI systems beyond manual analysis. Existing AI methods accurately predict trial failure, but do not provide actionable remedies. To fill this gap, this paper proposes ClinicalReTrial, a multi-agent system that formulates clinical trial optimization as an iterative redesign problem on textual protocols. Our method integrates failure diagnosis, safety-aware modifications, and candidate evaluation in a closed-loop, reward-driven optimization framework. Serving the outcome prediction model as a simulation environment, ClinicalReTrial enables low-cost evaluation and dense reward signals for continuous self-improvement. We further propose a hierarchical memory that captures iteration-level feedback within trials and distills transferable redesign patterns across trials. Empirically, ClinicalReTrial turns 56.7\% of failed protocols into predicted successes under the simulation environment, with a mean success probability gain of 7.4\% at negligible cost ($0.156 per trial). Extensive retrospective case studies further show that ClinicalReTrial recovers clinically meaningful modification patterns that align with real-world expert-driven protocol changes."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="xing-etal-2026-clinicalretrial">
<titleInfo>
<title>ClinicalReTrial: Clinical Trial Redesign with Self-Evolving Agents</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sixue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xing</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kerui</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xuanye</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Haoyu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">He</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Meng</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jiang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jintai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tianfan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Fu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-462-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Clinical trials constitute a critical yet exceptionally challenging and costly stage of drug development (2.6B per drug), where protocols are encoded as complex natural language documents, motivating the use of AI systems beyond manual analysis. Existing AI methods accurately predict trial failure, but do not provide actionable remedies. To fill this gap, this paper proposes ClinicalReTrial, a multi-agent system that formulates clinical trial optimization as an iterative redesign problem on textual protocols. Our method integrates failure diagnosis, safety-aware modifications, and candidate evaluation in a closed-loop, reward-driven optimization framework. Serving the outcome prediction model as a simulation environment, ClinicalReTrial enables low-cost evaluation and dense reward signals for continuous self-improvement. We further propose a hierarchical memory that captures iteration-level feedback within trials and distills transferable redesign patterns across trials. Empirically, ClinicalReTrial turns 56.7% of failed protocols into predicted successes under the simulation environment, with a mean success probability gain of 7.4% at negligible cost (0.156 per trial). Extensive retrospective case studies further show that ClinicalReTrial recovers clinically meaningful modification patterns that align with real-world expert-driven protocol changes.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">xing-etal-2026-clinicalretrial</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.772/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>16296</start>
<end>16330</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T ClinicalReTrial: Clinical Trial Redesign with Self-Evolving Agents
%A Xing, Sixue
%A Wu, Kerui
%A Xia, Xuanye
%A He, Haoyu
%A Jiang, Meng
%A Chen, Jintai
%A Fu, Tianfan
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-462-0
%F xing-etal-2026-clinicalretrial
%X Clinical trials constitute a critical yet exceptionally challenging and costly stage of drug development (2.6B per drug), where protocols are encoded as complex natural language documents, motivating the use of AI systems beyond manual analysis. Existing AI methods accurately predict trial failure, but do not provide actionable remedies. To fill this gap, this paper proposes ClinicalReTrial, a multi-agent system that formulates clinical trial optimization as an iterative redesign problem on textual protocols. Our method integrates failure diagnosis, safety-aware modifications, and candidate evaluation in a closed-loop, reward-driven optimization framework. Serving the outcome prediction model as a simulation environment, ClinicalReTrial enables low-cost evaluation and dense reward signals for continuous self-improvement. We further propose a hierarchical memory that captures iteration-level feedback within trials and distills transferable redesign patterns across trials. Empirically, ClinicalReTrial turns 56.7% of failed protocols into predicted successes under the simulation environment, with a mean success probability gain of 7.4% at negligible cost (0.156 per trial). Extensive retrospective case studies further show that ClinicalReTrial recovers clinically meaningful modification patterns that align with real-world expert-driven protocol changes.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.772/
%P 16296-16330
Markdown (Informal)
[ClinicalReTrial: Clinical Trial Redesign with Self-Evolving Agents](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.772/) (Xing et al., Findings 2026)
ACL