@inproceedings{zhang-etal-2026-um,
title = "Um, Actually: Timely and Calibrated Fact-Checking with {DIVER}",
author = "Zhang, Senyi and
Kabir, Tasnim and
Boyd-Graber, Jordan",
editor = "Lee, Hung-Yi and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Jessy and
Elliott, Desmond",
booktitle = "Findings of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics: {EMNLP} 2026",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.855/",
pages = "18092--18106",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-462-0",
abstract = "Fact verification pipelines are often unrealistic: they assume full-input access, operate on isolated atomic claims, and overlook the central question of when a system should act under partial evidence. We introduce DIVER (Deliberative and Iterative fact VERification), an LLM-based framework for calibrated incremental fact-checking. DIVER incrementally extracts verifiable atomic claims from progressively revealed input, retrieves and refines evidence through iterative web search, and triggers a correction as soon as a claim is reliably refuted; if no such trigger occurs, it performs a passage-level revision over the full input to recover missed errors. Across standard fact-checking benchmarks, DIVER outperforms strong LLM-based verification pipelines, with especially large gains on retrieval-intensive settings. We further introduce UmActually, a real-world benchmark built from the Internet game Um, Actually, to evaluate not only whether a system finds an error, but whether it does so at the right time. On UmActually, DIVER reports the strongest end-to-end results while typically buzzing close to the earliest valid decision point, supporting its effectiveness for calibrated incremental fact-checking."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="zhang-etal-2026-um">
<titleInfo>
<title>Um, Actually: Timely and Calibrated Fact-Checking with DIVER</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Senyi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tasnim</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kabir</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jordan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Boyd-Graber</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hung-Yi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lee</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jessy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Elliott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-462-0</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Fact verification pipelines are often unrealistic: they assume full-input access, operate on isolated atomic claims, and overlook the central question of when a system should act under partial evidence. We introduce DIVER (Deliberative and Iterative fact VERification), an LLM-based framework for calibrated incremental fact-checking. DIVER incrementally extracts verifiable atomic claims from progressively revealed input, retrieves and refines evidence through iterative web search, and triggers a correction as soon as a claim is reliably refuted; if no such trigger occurs, it performs a passage-level revision over the full input to recover missed errors. Across standard fact-checking benchmarks, DIVER outperforms strong LLM-based verification pipelines, with especially large gains on retrieval-intensive settings. We further introduce UmActually, a real-world benchmark built from the Internet game Um, Actually, to evaluate not only whether a system finds an error, but whether it does so at the right time. On UmActually, DIVER reports the strongest end-to-end results while typically buzzing close to the earliest valid decision point, supporting its effectiveness for calibrated incremental fact-checking.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">zhang-etal-2026-um</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.855/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>18092</start>
<end>18106</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Um, Actually: Timely and Calibrated Fact-Checking with DIVER
%A Zhang, Senyi
%A Kabir, Tasnim
%A Boyd-Graber, Jordan
%Y Lee, Hung-Yi
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Jessy
%Y Elliott, Desmond
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2026
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-462-0
%F zhang-etal-2026-um
%X Fact verification pipelines are often unrealistic: they assume full-input access, operate on isolated atomic claims, and overlook the central question of when a system should act under partial evidence. We introduce DIVER (Deliberative and Iterative fact VERification), an LLM-based framework for calibrated incremental fact-checking. DIVER incrementally extracts verifiable atomic claims from progressively revealed input, retrieves and refines evidence through iterative web search, and triggers a correction as soon as a claim is reliably refuted; if no such trigger occurs, it performs a passage-level revision over the full input to recover missed errors. Across standard fact-checking benchmarks, DIVER outperforms strong LLM-based verification pipelines, with especially large gains on retrieval-intensive settings. We further introduce UmActually, a real-world benchmark built from the Internet game Um, Actually, to evaluate not only whether a system finds an error, but whether it does so at the right time. On UmActually, DIVER reports the strongest end-to-end results while typically buzzing close to the earliest valid decision point, supporting its effectiveness for calibrated incremental fact-checking.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.855/
%P 18092-18106
Markdown (Informal)
[Um, Actually: Timely and Calibrated Fact-Checking with DIVER](https://aclanthology.org/2026.findings-emnlp.855/) (Zhang et al., Findings 2026)
ACL