@inproceedings{jaff-2026-consensus,
title = "From Consensus to Split Decisions: {ABC}-Stratified Sentiment in Holocaust Oral Histories",
author = "Jaff, Daban Q.",
editor = "Anuradha, Isuri and
Wynne, Martin",
booktitle = "Proceedings of The Second Workshop on Holocaust Testimonies as Language Resources ({HTR}es)",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma, Mallorca (Spain)",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.htres-2.4/",
doi = "10.63317/2t969u9fy4gf",
pages = "29--36",
abstract = "Polarity detection becomes substantially more challenging under domain shift, particularly in heterogeneous long-form narratives with complex discourse structure, such as Holocaust oral histories. This paper presents a corpus-scale diagnostic study of off-the-shelf sentiment classifiers on Holocaust oral histories, using three pretrained transformer-based polarity classifiers over a corpus comprising 107,304 utterances and 579,013 sentences. After assembling model outputs, we introduce an agreement-based stability taxonomy (ABC) to stratify inter-model output stability. We report pairwise percent agreement, Cohen{'}s {\ensuremath{\kappa}}, Fleiss' {\ensuremath{\kappa}}, and row-normalized confusion matrices to localize systematic disagreement. As an external convergent descriptive signal, we apply a T5-based emotion classifier to stratified samples from each agreement stratum to compare emotion distributions across strata. The combination of multi-model label triangulation and the ABC taxonomy provides a cautious, interpretable framework for characterizing where and how sentiment models diverge in sensitive historical narratives. Inter-model agreement is low to moderate overall and is driven primarily by boundary decisions around neutrality."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="jaff-2026-consensus">
<titleInfo>
<title>From Consensus to Split Decisions: ABC-Stratified Sentiment in Holocaust Oral Histories</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Daban</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Q</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jaff</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of The Second Workshop on Holocaust Testimonies as Language Resources (HTRes)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Isuri</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Anuradha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Martin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wynne</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma, Mallorca (Spain)</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Polarity detection becomes substantially more challenging under domain shift, particularly in heterogeneous long-form narratives with complex discourse structure, such as Holocaust oral histories. This paper presents a corpus-scale diagnostic study of off-the-shelf sentiment classifiers on Holocaust oral histories, using three pretrained transformer-based polarity classifiers over a corpus comprising 107,304 utterances and 579,013 sentences. After assembling model outputs, we introduce an agreement-based stability taxonomy (ABC) to stratify inter-model output stability. We report pairwise percent agreement, Cohen’s \ensuremathąppa, Fleiss’ \ensuremathąppa, and row-normalized confusion matrices to localize systematic disagreement. As an external convergent descriptive signal, we apply a T5-based emotion classifier to stratified samples from each agreement stratum to compare emotion distributions across strata. The combination of multi-model label triangulation and the ABC taxonomy provides a cautious, interpretable framework for characterizing where and how sentiment models diverge in sensitive historical narratives. Inter-model agreement is low to moderate overall and is driven primarily by boundary decisions around neutrality.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">jaff-2026-consensus</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/2t969u9fy4gf</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.htres-2.4/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>29</start>
<end>36</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T From Consensus to Split Decisions: ABC-Stratified Sentiment in Holocaust Oral Histories
%A Jaff, Daban Q.
%Y Anuradha, Isuri
%Y Wynne, Martin
%S Proceedings of The Second Workshop on Holocaust Testimonies as Language Resources (HTRes)
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)
%C Palma, Mallorca (Spain)
%F jaff-2026-consensus
%X Polarity detection becomes substantially more challenging under domain shift, particularly in heterogeneous long-form narratives with complex discourse structure, such as Holocaust oral histories. This paper presents a corpus-scale diagnostic study of off-the-shelf sentiment classifiers on Holocaust oral histories, using three pretrained transformer-based polarity classifiers over a corpus comprising 107,304 utterances and 579,013 sentences. After assembling model outputs, we introduce an agreement-based stability taxonomy (ABC) to stratify inter-model output stability. We report pairwise percent agreement, Cohen’s \ensuremathąppa, Fleiss’ \ensuremathąppa, and row-normalized confusion matrices to localize systematic disagreement. As an external convergent descriptive signal, we apply a T5-based emotion classifier to stratified samples from each agreement stratum to compare emotion distributions across strata. The combination of multi-model label triangulation and the ABC taxonomy provides a cautious, interpretable framework for characterizing where and how sentiment models diverge in sensitive historical narratives. Inter-model agreement is low to moderate overall and is driven primarily by boundary decisions around neutrality.
%R 10.63317/2t969u9fy4gf
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.htres-2.4/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/2t969u9fy4gf
%P 29-36
Markdown (Informal)
[From Consensus to Split Decisions: ABC-Stratified Sentiment in Holocaust Oral Histories](https://aclanthology.org/2026.htres-2.4/) (Jaff, htres 2026)
ACL