@inproceedings{osvath-etal-2026-impact,
title = "The Impact of Tokenization Algorithms on {H}ungarian Language Model Performance",
author = "Osv{\'a}th, M{\'a}ty{\'a}s and
Moln{\'a}r, M{\'a}t{\'e} Norbert and
Gunics, Roland and
Ligeti-Nagy, No{\'e}mi",
editor = "Piperidis, Stelios and
Bel, N{\'u}ria and
van den Heuvel, Henk and
Ide, Nancy and
Krek, Simon and
Toral, Antonio",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma de Mallorca, Spain",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resource Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.199/",
doi = "10.63317/29hx92kq2dxe",
pages = "2545--2556",
abstract = "Tokenization is a crucial text processing step for preparing input for language models and can contribute to model performance, especially in morphologically rich languages. Currently, Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and Unigram LM algorithms are predominantly used in language models, but their effects can vary in agglutinative languages. This work compares these tokenization algorithms across varying vocabulary sizes, as well as a modified Unigram LM variant with morphologically informed initialization, on the Hungarian subset of the OSCAR dataset. The evaluation is based on several metrics describing the inferred quality of the tokenizers and on the downstream performance of multiple BERT models on the HuLU benchmark. Results show that BPE produces the most compact and morphologically aligned subword representations, while the modified Unigram LM achieved the best overall downstream performance across tasks. However, differences between methods and vocabulary sizes were generally small and not statistically significant, with the exception of HuCoPA (a task within the HuLU benchmark), which showed sensitivity to both factors. These findings underscore that tokenizer choice and vocabulary design are critical determinants of language model efficiency and performance in morphologically rich languages."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="osvath-etal-2026-impact">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Impact of Tokenization Algorithms on Hungarian Language Model Performance</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mátyás</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Osváth</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Máté</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Norbert</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Molnár</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roland</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gunics</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Noémi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ligeti-Nagy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Núria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van den Heuvel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ide</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toral</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resource Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma de Mallorca, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Tokenization is a crucial text processing step for preparing input for language models and can contribute to model performance, especially in morphologically rich languages. Currently, Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and Unigram LM algorithms are predominantly used in language models, but their effects can vary in agglutinative languages. This work compares these tokenization algorithms across varying vocabulary sizes, as well as a modified Unigram LM variant with morphologically informed initialization, on the Hungarian subset of the OSCAR dataset. The evaluation is based on several metrics describing the inferred quality of the tokenizers and on the downstream performance of multiple BERT models on the HuLU benchmark. Results show that BPE produces the most compact and morphologically aligned subword representations, while the modified Unigram LM achieved the best overall downstream performance across tasks. However, differences between methods and vocabulary sizes were generally small and not statistically significant, with the exception of HuCoPA (a task within the HuLU benchmark), which showed sensitivity to both factors. These findings underscore that tokenizer choice and vocabulary design are critical determinants of language model efficiency and performance in morphologically rich languages.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">osvath-etal-2026-impact</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/29hx92kq2dxe</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.199/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>2545</start>
<end>2556</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T The Impact of Tokenization Algorithms on Hungarian Language Model Performance
%A Osváth, Mátyás
%A Molnár, Máté Norbert
%A Gunics, Roland
%A Ligeti-Nagy, Noémi
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Bel, Núria
%Y van den Heuvel, Henk
%Y Ide, Nancy
%Y Krek, Simon
%Y Toral, Antonio
%S Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resource Association
%C Palma de Mallorca, Spain
%F osvath-etal-2026-impact
%X Tokenization is a crucial text processing step for preparing input for language models and can contribute to model performance, especially in morphologically rich languages. Currently, Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), WordPiece, and Unigram LM algorithms are predominantly used in language models, but their effects can vary in agglutinative languages. This work compares these tokenization algorithms across varying vocabulary sizes, as well as a modified Unigram LM variant with morphologically informed initialization, on the Hungarian subset of the OSCAR dataset. The evaluation is based on several metrics describing the inferred quality of the tokenizers and on the downstream performance of multiple BERT models on the HuLU benchmark. Results show that BPE produces the most compact and morphologically aligned subword representations, while the modified Unigram LM achieved the best overall downstream performance across tasks. However, differences between methods and vocabulary sizes were generally small and not statistically significant, with the exception of HuCoPA (a task within the HuLU benchmark), which showed sensitivity to both factors. These findings underscore that tokenizer choice and vocabulary design are critical determinants of language model efficiency and performance in morphologically rich languages.
%R 10.63317/29hx92kq2dxe
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.199/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/29hx92kq2dxe
%P 2545-2556
Markdown (Informal)
[The Impact of Tokenization Algorithms on Hungarian Language Model Performance](https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.199/) (Osváth et al., LREC 2026)
ACL