Evaluating Phonetically Weighted and Unweighted Distance Measures in Dialectometry

Alfred Lameli


Abstract
This paper compares phonetically weighted and unweighted string distance measures in dialectometry, examining how explicit phonetic modeling affects the quantitative representation of linguistic similarity. Using narrow IPA transcriptions from the German REDE corpus, we evaluate nine measures–Levenshtein distance, bigram and trigram overlap, cosine distance, Jaro-Winkler, Jaccard similarity, the Herrgen-Schmidt measure, and the Relative Identity Value–through correlational analysis, distributional comparison, stabilization testing, and multidimensional scaling. The phonetically weighted Herrgen-Schmidt measure consistently achieves the most balanced distance dispersion, earliest stabilization, and highest linguistic plausibility. Unweighted edit-based measures reproduce the same topological structure in compressed form; distributional and overlap-based metrics introduce systematic scale distortions through exaggeration or compression. These findings establish explicit phonetic weighting as a principled and analytically efficient extension of standard dialectometric procedures. Explicit phonetic weighting enhances resolution and interpretive precision without altering the underlying relational geometry of dialect classifications.
Anthology ID:
2026.lrec-1.327
Volume:
Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
Month:
May
Year:
2026
Address:
Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Editors:
Stelios Piperidis, Núria Bel, Henk van den Heuvel, Nancy Ide, Simon Krek, Antonio Toral
Venue:
LREC
SIG:
Publisher:
ELRA Language Resource Association
Note:
Pages:
4141–4151
Language:
External URL:
https://lrec.elra.info/lrec2026-main-327
DOI:
10.63317/38ndhg759wui
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Alfred Lameli. 2026. Evaluating Phonetically Weighted and Unweighted Distance Measures in Dialectometry. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 4141–4151, Palma de Mallorca, Spain. ELRA Language Resource Association.
Cite (Informal):
Evaluating Phonetically Weighted and Unweighted Distance Measures in Dialectometry (Lameli, LREC 2026)
Copy Citation: