@inproceedings{rigouts-terryn-2026-large,
title = "Large Language Models Are Good Term Extractors: A Systematic Evaluation",
author = "Rigouts Terryn, Ayla",
editor = "Piperidis, Stelios and
Bel, N{\'u}ria and
van den Heuvel, Henk and
Ide, Nancy and
Krek, Simon and
Toral, Antonio",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma de Mallorca, Spain",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resource Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.605/",
doi = "10.63317/49gta5itne3q",
pages = "7631--7643",
abstract = "This paper systematically evaluates modern large language models for automatic term extraction (ATE), examining GPT-5 and Mistral across four domains and three languages using the ACTER corpus. The study compares model sizes, evaluates reasoning-enhanced variants, and tests prompting strategies aligned with human annotation guidelines. Beyond extracting term lists, models provide term labels, confidence scores, and terminology management remarks. Current large language models achieve F1 scores of .36-.72; while seemingly low, this is competitive with supervised approaches and approaches the human inter-annotator agreement ceiling of {\textasciitilde}0.59. Larger models outperform smaller variants, with reasoning-enhanced models showing modest improvements. Qualitative error analysis reveals that evaluation methodology partly misrepresents model capabilities: many extractions classified as errors represent defensible boundary judgements, and apparent hallucinations are predominantly (though not exclusively) valid normalisations. Limitations remain in fine-grained categorisation and handling overly general expressions. However, the convergence of model scores with each other and with human inter-annotator agreement suggests that, for high-resource languages, basic ATE may no longer be the bottleneck in terminology management pipelines, and research should shift toward downstream tasks such as definition generation and ontology construction."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="rigouts-terryn-2026-large">
<titleInfo>
<title>Large Language Models Are Good Term Extractors: A Systematic Evaluation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ayla</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rigouts Terryn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Núria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van den Heuvel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ide</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toral</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resource Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma de Mallorca, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper systematically evaluates modern large language models for automatic term extraction (ATE), examining GPT-5 and Mistral across four domains and three languages using the ACTER corpus. The study compares model sizes, evaluates reasoning-enhanced variants, and tests prompting strategies aligned with human annotation guidelines. Beyond extracting term lists, models provide term labels, confidence scores, and terminology management remarks. Current large language models achieve F1 scores of .36-.72; while seemingly low, this is competitive with supervised approaches and approaches the human inter-annotator agreement ceiling of ~0.59. Larger models outperform smaller variants, with reasoning-enhanced models showing modest improvements. Qualitative error analysis reveals that evaluation methodology partly misrepresents model capabilities: many extractions classified as errors represent defensible boundary judgements, and apparent hallucinations are predominantly (though not exclusively) valid normalisations. Limitations remain in fine-grained categorisation and handling overly general expressions. However, the convergence of model scores with each other and with human inter-annotator agreement suggests that, for high-resource languages, basic ATE may no longer be the bottleneck in terminology management pipelines, and research should shift toward downstream tasks such as definition generation and ontology construction.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">rigouts-terryn-2026-large</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/49gta5itne3q</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.605/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>7631</start>
<end>7643</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Large Language Models Are Good Term Extractors: A Systematic Evaluation
%A Rigouts Terryn, Ayla
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Bel, Núria
%Y van den Heuvel, Henk
%Y Ide, Nancy
%Y Krek, Simon
%Y Toral, Antonio
%S Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resource Association
%C Palma de Mallorca, Spain
%F rigouts-terryn-2026-large
%X This paper systematically evaluates modern large language models for automatic term extraction (ATE), examining GPT-5 and Mistral across four domains and three languages using the ACTER corpus. The study compares model sizes, evaluates reasoning-enhanced variants, and tests prompting strategies aligned with human annotation guidelines. Beyond extracting term lists, models provide term labels, confidence scores, and terminology management remarks. Current large language models achieve F1 scores of .36-.72; while seemingly low, this is competitive with supervised approaches and approaches the human inter-annotator agreement ceiling of ~0.59. Larger models outperform smaller variants, with reasoning-enhanced models showing modest improvements. Qualitative error analysis reveals that evaluation methodology partly misrepresents model capabilities: many extractions classified as errors represent defensible boundary judgements, and apparent hallucinations are predominantly (though not exclusively) valid normalisations. Limitations remain in fine-grained categorisation and handling overly general expressions. However, the convergence of model scores with each other and with human inter-annotator agreement suggests that, for high-resource languages, basic ATE may no longer be the bottleneck in terminology management pipelines, and research should shift toward downstream tasks such as definition generation and ontology construction.
%R 10.63317/49gta5itne3q
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.605/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/49gta5itne3q
%P 7631-7643
Markdown (Informal)
[Large Language Models Are Good Term Extractors: A Systematic Evaluation](https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.605/) (Rigouts Terryn, LREC 2026)
ACL