@inproceedings{saeed-etal-2026-surfacing,
title = "Surfacing Subtle Stereotypes: A Multilingual, Debate-Oriented Evaluation of {M}odern {LLM}s",
author = "Saeed, Muhammed Yahia Gaffar and
Abdul-Mageed, Muhammad and
Shehata, Shady",
editor = "Piperidis, Stelios and
Bel, N{\'u}ria and
van den Heuvel, Henk and
Ide, Nancy and
Krek, Simon and
Toral, Antonio",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma de Mallorca, Spain",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resource Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.643/",
doi = "10.63317/4u9x3z4g8jfk",
pages = "8106--8121",
abstract = "Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed for open-ended communication, yet most bias evaluations still rely on English, classification-style tasks. We introduce , a new multilingual, debate-style benchmark designed to reveal how narrative bias appears in realistic generative settings. Our dataset includes 8{,}400 structured debate prompts spanning four sensitive domains {--} Women{'}s Rights, Backwardness, Terrorism, and Religion {--} across seven languages ranging from high-resource (English, Chinese) to low-resource (Swahili, Nigerian Pidgin). Using four flagship models (GPT-4o, Claude{~}3.5{~}Haiku, DeepSeek-Chat, and LLaMA-3-70B), we generate over 100{,}000 debate responses and automatically classify which demographic groups are assigned stereotyped versus modern roles. Results show that all models reproduce entrenched stereotypes despite safety alignment: Arabs are overwhelmingly linked to Terrorism and Religion ($\geq$89{\%}), Africans to socioeconomic ``backwardness'' (up to 77{\%}), and Western groups are consistently framed as modern or progressive. Biases grow sharply in lower-resource languages, revealing that alignment trained primarily in English does not generalize globally. Our findings highlight a persistent divide in multilingual fairness: current alignment methods reduce explicit toxicity but fail to prevent biased outputs in open-ended contexts. We release our benchmark and analysis framework to support the next generation of multilingual bias evaluation and safer, culturally inclusive model alignment"
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="saeed-etal-2026-surfacing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Surfacing Subtle Stereotypes: A Multilingual, Debate-Oriented Evaluation of Modern LLMs</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Muhammed</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Yahia</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Gaffar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Saeed</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Muhammad</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Abdul-Mageed</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shady</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shehata</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Núria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van den Heuvel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ide</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toral</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resource Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma de Mallorca, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed for open-ended communication, yet most bias evaluations still rely on English, classification-style tasks. We introduce , a new multilingual, debate-style benchmark designed to reveal how narrative bias appears in realistic generative settings. Our dataset includes 8,400 structured debate prompts spanning four sensitive domains – Women’s Rights, Backwardness, Terrorism, and Religion – across seven languages ranging from high-resource (English, Chinese) to low-resource (Swahili, Nigerian Pidgin). Using four flagship models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Haiku, DeepSeek-Chat, and LLaMA-3-70B), we generate over 100,000 debate responses and automatically classify which demographic groups are assigned stereotyped versus modern roles. Results show that all models reproduce entrenched stereotypes despite safety alignment: Arabs are overwhelmingly linked to Terrorism and Religion (\geq89%), Africans to socioeconomic “backwardness” (up to 77%), and Western groups are consistently framed as modern or progressive. Biases grow sharply in lower-resource languages, revealing that alignment trained primarily in English does not generalize globally. Our findings highlight a persistent divide in multilingual fairness: current alignment methods reduce explicit toxicity but fail to prevent biased outputs in open-ended contexts. We release our benchmark and analysis framework to support the next generation of multilingual bias evaluation and safer, culturally inclusive model alignment</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">saeed-etal-2026-surfacing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/4u9x3z4g8jfk</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.643/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>8106</start>
<end>8121</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Surfacing Subtle Stereotypes: A Multilingual, Debate-Oriented Evaluation of Modern LLMs
%A Saeed, Muhammed Yahia Gaffar
%A Abdul-Mageed, Muhammad
%A Shehata, Shady
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Bel, Núria
%Y van den Heuvel, Henk
%Y Ide, Nancy
%Y Krek, Simon
%Y Toral, Antonio
%S Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resource Association
%C Palma de Mallorca, Spain
%F saeed-etal-2026-surfacing
%X Large language models (LLMs) are widely deployed for open-ended communication, yet most bias evaluations still rely on English, classification-style tasks. We introduce , a new multilingual, debate-style benchmark designed to reveal how narrative bias appears in realistic generative settings. Our dataset includes 8,400 structured debate prompts spanning four sensitive domains – Women’s Rights, Backwardness, Terrorism, and Religion – across seven languages ranging from high-resource (English, Chinese) to low-resource (Swahili, Nigerian Pidgin). Using four flagship models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Haiku, DeepSeek-Chat, and LLaMA-3-70B), we generate over 100,000 debate responses and automatically classify which demographic groups are assigned stereotyped versus modern roles. Results show that all models reproduce entrenched stereotypes despite safety alignment: Arabs are overwhelmingly linked to Terrorism and Religion (\geq89%), Africans to socioeconomic “backwardness” (up to 77%), and Western groups are consistently framed as modern or progressive. Biases grow sharply in lower-resource languages, revealing that alignment trained primarily in English does not generalize globally. Our findings highlight a persistent divide in multilingual fairness: current alignment methods reduce explicit toxicity but fail to prevent biased outputs in open-ended contexts. We release our benchmark and analysis framework to support the next generation of multilingual bias evaluation and safer, culturally inclusive model alignment
%R 10.63317/4u9x3z4g8jfk
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.643/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/4u9x3z4g8jfk
%P 8106-8121
Markdown (Informal)
[Surfacing Subtle Stereotypes: A Multilingual, Debate-Oriented Evaluation of Modern LLMs](https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.643/) (Saeed et al., LREC 2026)
ACL