@inproceedings{brouat-etal-2026-towards,
title = "Towards Complex Debate Understanding: Predicting Claim Impact Scores through the Modelling of Claim Interactions",
author = "Brouat, Maxime and
Surdeanu, Mihai and
Vesic, Srdjan and
Blanco, Eduardo",
editor = "Piperidis, Stelios and
Bel, N{\'u}ria and
van den Heuvel, Henk and
Ide, Nancy and
Krek, Simon and
Toral, Antonio",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma de Mallorca, Spain",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resource Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.656/",
doi = "10.63317/56u9na3ackbw",
pages = "8291--8302",
abstract = "Structured debates can be naturally modeled as argument graphs, with claims connected by support and attack relations, a representation formalised in Computational Argumentation Theory. In this paper, we propose a novel neural architecture that jointly models both the textual content of claims and their relational structure. Claims are encoded using contextualised embeddings and compressed through a feedforward compression layer. Then, a graph attention network explicitly captures attack/support interactions. Trained on real-world debates from the Kialo platform, our model predicts the distribution of user-assigned impact votes for each claim. It achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.068, significantly outperforming both text-only and structure-only baselines. Further experiments show strong out-of-domain generalisation across thematic clusters, as well as suggestive correlations between the model{'}s attention patterns and human voting behaviour. An analysis of linguistic and graph-based features suggests that the model relies on latent argumentative patterns as well as the text. Our findings also shed light on language differences between strong and weak claims, as determined by humans as well as by our best model."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="brouat-etal-2026-towards">
<titleInfo>
<title>Towards Complex Debate Understanding: Predicting Claim Impact Scores through the Modelling of Claim Interactions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maxime</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brouat</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mihai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Surdeanu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Srdjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vesic</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eduardo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blanco</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Núria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van den Heuvel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ide</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toral</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resource Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma de Mallorca, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Structured debates can be naturally modeled as argument graphs, with claims connected by support and attack relations, a representation formalised in Computational Argumentation Theory. In this paper, we propose a novel neural architecture that jointly models both the textual content of claims and their relational structure. Claims are encoded using contextualised embeddings and compressed through a feedforward compression layer. Then, a graph attention network explicitly captures attack/support interactions. Trained on real-world debates from the Kialo platform, our model predicts the distribution of user-assigned impact votes for each claim. It achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.068, significantly outperforming both text-only and structure-only baselines. Further experiments show strong out-of-domain generalisation across thematic clusters, as well as suggestive correlations between the model’s attention patterns and human voting behaviour. An analysis of linguistic and graph-based features suggests that the model relies on latent argumentative patterns as well as the text. Our findings also shed light on language differences between strong and weak claims, as determined by humans as well as by our best model.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">brouat-etal-2026-towards</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/56u9na3ackbw</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.656/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>8291</start>
<end>8302</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Towards Complex Debate Understanding: Predicting Claim Impact Scores through the Modelling of Claim Interactions
%A Brouat, Maxime
%A Surdeanu, Mihai
%A Vesic, Srdjan
%A Blanco, Eduardo
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Bel, Núria
%Y van den Heuvel, Henk
%Y Ide, Nancy
%Y Krek, Simon
%Y Toral, Antonio
%S Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resource Association
%C Palma de Mallorca, Spain
%F brouat-etal-2026-towards
%X Structured debates can be naturally modeled as argument graphs, with claims connected by support and attack relations, a representation formalised in Computational Argumentation Theory. In this paper, we propose a novel neural architecture that jointly models both the textual content of claims and their relational structure. Claims are encoded using contextualised embeddings and compressed through a feedforward compression layer. Then, a graph attention network explicitly captures attack/support interactions. Trained on real-world debates from the Kialo platform, our model predicts the distribution of user-assigned impact votes for each claim. It achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.068, significantly outperforming both text-only and structure-only baselines. Further experiments show strong out-of-domain generalisation across thematic clusters, as well as suggestive correlations between the model’s attention patterns and human voting behaviour. An analysis of linguistic and graph-based features suggests that the model relies on latent argumentative patterns as well as the text. Our findings also shed light on language differences between strong and weak claims, as determined by humans as well as by our best model.
%R 10.63317/56u9na3ackbw
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.656/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/56u9na3ackbw
%P 8291-8302
Markdown (Informal)
[Towards Complex Debate Understanding: Predicting Claim Impact Scores through the Modelling of Claim Interactions](https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.656/) (Brouat et al., LREC 2026)
ACL