@inproceedings{locaputo-etal-2026-ithaca,
title = "Ithaca Revisited: Benchmarking a Domain-Specific Model for Epigraphy in the Age of {LLM}s",
author = "Locaputo, Alessandro and
Brunello, Andrea and
Saccomanno, Nicola and
Platanou, Paraskevi and
Serra, Giuseppe",
editor = "Piperidis, Stelios and
Bel, N{\'u}ria and
van den Heuvel, Henk and
Ide, Nancy and
Krek, Simon and
Toral, Antonio",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma de Mallorca, Spain",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resource Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.82/",
doi = "10.63317/3gucgvmwsf45",
pages = "1054--1070",
abstract = "The restoration and interpretation of fragmentary inscriptions remain central challenges in epigraphy, where scholars must reconstruct missing text and determine an inscription{'}s provenance and chronology from limited evidence. Ithaca, a neural model introduced in 2022, represented a landmark advance in this field, achieving highly accurate results in text restoration and spatio-temporal attribution. Since then, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini have achieved remarkable versatility across many domains, raising the question of whether specialized architectures like Ithaca are still required. In this paper, we revisit Ithaca with a dual focus. First, we benchmark its performance against GPT-5, finding that Ithaca continues to substantially outperform a state-of-the-art general-purpose LLM used in a retrieval-augmented in-context learning setting. Second, we conduct a systematic analysis to characterize Ithaca{'}s behavior under varying conditions, including lacuna size and position, inscription origin, and semantic topic. Statistical analyses highlight its systematic strengths and weaknesses. Taken together, our results map Ithaca{'}s performance profile, enabling more informed use in research and teaching."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="locaputo-etal-2026-ithaca">
<titleInfo>
<title>Ithaca Revisited: Benchmarking a Domain-Specific Model for Epigraphy in the Age of LLMs</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alessandro</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Locaputo</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andrea</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brunello</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nicola</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Saccomanno</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Paraskevi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Platanou</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giuseppe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Serra</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Núria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Henk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">van den Heuvel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nancy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ide</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Krek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antonio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Toral</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resource Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma de Mallorca, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The restoration and interpretation of fragmentary inscriptions remain central challenges in epigraphy, where scholars must reconstruct missing text and determine an inscription’s provenance and chronology from limited evidence. Ithaca, a neural model introduced in 2022, represented a landmark advance in this field, achieving highly accurate results in text restoration and spatio-temporal attribution. Since then, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini have achieved remarkable versatility across many domains, raising the question of whether specialized architectures like Ithaca are still required. In this paper, we revisit Ithaca with a dual focus. First, we benchmark its performance against GPT-5, finding that Ithaca continues to substantially outperform a state-of-the-art general-purpose LLM used in a retrieval-augmented in-context learning setting. Second, we conduct a systematic analysis to characterize Ithaca’s behavior under varying conditions, including lacuna size and position, inscription origin, and semantic topic. Statistical analyses highlight its systematic strengths and weaknesses. Taken together, our results map Ithaca’s performance profile, enabling more informed use in research and teaching.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">locaputo-etal-2026-ithaca</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/3gucgvmwsf45</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.82/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1054</start>
<end>1070</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Ithaca Revisited: Benchmarking a Domain-Specific Model for Epigraphy in the Age of LLMs
%A Locaputo, Alessandro
%A Brunello, Andrea
%A Saccomanno, Nicola
%A Platanou, Paraskevi
%A Serra, Giuseppe
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Bel, Núria
%Y van den Heuvel, Henk
%Y Ide, Nancy
%Y Krek, Simon
%Y Toral, Antonio
%S Proceedings of the Fifteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resource Association
%C Palma de Mallorca, Spain
%F locaputo-etal-2026-ithaca
%X The restoration and interpretation of fragmentary inscriptions remain central challenges in epigraphy, where scholars must reconstruct missing text and determine an inscription’s provenance and chronology from limited evidence. Ithaca, a neural model introduced in 2022, represented a landmark advance in this field, achieving highly accurate results in text restoration and spatio-temporal attribution. Since then, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) such as GPT, Claude, and Gemini have achieved remarkable versatility across many domains, raising the question of whether specialized architectures like Ithaca are still required. In this paper, we revisit Ithaca with a dual focus. First, we benchmark its performance against GPT-5, finding that Ithaca continues to substantially outperform a state-of-the-art general-purpose LLM used in a retrieval-augmented in-context learning setting. Second, we conduct a systematic analysis to characterize Ithaca’s behavior under varying conditions, including lacuna size and position, inscription origin, and semantic topic. Statistical analyses highlight its systematic strengths and weaknesses. Taken together, our results map Ithaca’s performance profile, enabling more informed use in research and teaching.
%R 10.63317/3gucgvmwsf45
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.82/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/3gucgvmwsf45
%P 1054-1070
Markdown (Informal)
[Ithaca Revisited: Benchmarking a Domain-Specific Model for Epigraphy in the Age of LLMs](https://aclanthology.org/2026.lrec-1.82/) (Locaputo et al., LREC 2026)
ACL