@inproceedings{xiang-guan-2026-one,
title = "One Image, No Tokens: A Controlled Study of Glyph-Based {C}hinese Language Modeling",
author = "Xiang, Shuyang and
Guan, Hao",
editor = "Adelani, David Ifeoluwa and
Alabi, Jesujoba and
Arnett, Catherine and
Chang, Tyler and
Downey, C.M. and
Goldman, Omer and
Li, Senyu and
Miranda, Lester James Validad and
Qi, Jirui and
Stap, David and
Winata, Genta Indra and
Zhang, Xinyu Crystina",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning ({MRL} 2026)",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.mrl-1.3/",
pages = "27--36",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-469-9",
abstract = "Modern language models generally represent text as sequences of discrete token embeddings, an assumption deeply rooted in current practice but rarely questioned. We challenge this representation, especially for Chinese, by replacing index-based token embeddings entirely with a single rasterized image of the character sequence, processed by a vision encoder composed of a shared ResNet and a shallow Vision Transformer. To isolate the role of input representation, we construct a dual-branch controlled framework in which both a Vision-based model and an index-based baseline share an identical decoder backbone, training objective, optimizer, and data curriculum. Any performance difference is therefore attributable to the input modality only. Across all tested decoder backbones, the Vision-based model consistently outperforms the baseline, reaching a peak accuracy of 0.429 versus 0.355 for the index-based baseline{---}a 21{\%} relative improvement{---}while converging in about half the number of training epochs. The advantage emerges especially within the first five epochs (under 21{\%} of total data) and persists under moderate character corruption: the corrupted Vision model matches the \textit{clean} index-based baseline. Ablation studies reveal that the advantage requires both spatially coherent input and a ViT encoder with 2D positional encodings. A cross-script comparison on English shows the advantage does not transfer directly to alphabetic writing systems, suggesting that the uniform visual density and radical structure of Chinese characters are enabling conditions. These findings suggest that transformers are more modality-agnostic than commonly assumed, and that discrete tokenization is not a fundamental requirement for Chinese language modeling."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="xiang-guan-2026-one">
<titleInfo>
<title>One Image, No Tokens: A Controlled Study of Glyph-Based Chinese Language Modeling</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shuyang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xiang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hao</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Guan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL 2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Ifeoluwa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Adelani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jesujoba</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alabi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Catherine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Arnett</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tyler</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">C</namePart>
<namePart type="given">M</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Downey</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Omer</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Goldman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Senyu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lester</namePart>
<namePart type="given">James</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Validad</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Miranda</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jirui</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Qi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stap</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Genta</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Indra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Winata</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Xinyu</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Crystina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-469-9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Modern language models generally represent text as sequences of discrete token embeddings, an assumption deeply rooted in current practice but rarely questioned. We challenge this representation, especially for Chinese, by replacing index-based token embeddings entirely with a single rasterized image of the character sequence, processed by a vision encoder composed of a shared ResNet and a shallow Vision Transformer. To isolate the role of input representation, we construct a dual-branch controlled framework in which both a Vision-based model and an index-based baseline share an identical decoder backbone, training objective, optimizer, and data curriculum. Any performance difference is therefore attributable to the input modality only. Across all tested decoder backbones, the Vision-based model consistently outperforms the baseline, reaching a peak accuracy of 0.429 versus 0.355 for the index-based baseline—a 21% relative improvement—while converging in about half the number of training epochs. The advantage emerges especially within the first five epochs (under 21% of total data) and persists under moderate character corruption: the corrupted Vision model matches the clean index-based baseline. Ablation studies reveal that the advantage requires both spatially coherent input and a ViT encoder with 2D positional encodings. A cross-script comparison on English shows the advantage does not transfer directly to alphabetic writing systems, suggesting that the uniform visual density and radical structure of Chinese characters are enabling conditions. These findings suggest that transformers are more modality-agnostic than commonly assumed, and that discrete tokenization is not a fundamental requirement for Chinese language modeling.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">xiang-guan-2026-one</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.mrl-1.3/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>27</start>
<end>36</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T One Image, No Tokens: A Controlled Study of Glyph-Based Chinese Language Modeling
%A Xiang, Shuyang
%A Guan, Hao
%Y Adelani, David Ifeoluwa
%Y Alabi, Jesujoba
%Y Arnett, Catherine
%Y Chang, Tyler
%Y Downey, C. M.
%Y Goldman, Omer
%Y Li, Senyu
%Y Miranda, Lester James Validad
%Y Qi, Jirui
%Y Stap, David
%Y Winata, Genta Indra
%Y Zhang, Xinyu Crystina
%S Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Multilingual Representation Learning (MRL 2026)
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-469-9
%F xiang-guan-2026-one
%X Modern language models generally represent text as sequences of discrete token embeddings, an assumption deeply rooted in current practice but rarely questioned. We challenge this representation, especially for Chinese, by replacing index-based token embeddings entirely with a single rasterized image of the character sequence, processed by a vision encoder composed of a shared ResNet and a shallow Vision Transformer. To isolate the role of input representation, we construct a dual-branch controlled framework in which both a Vision-based model and an index-based baseline share an identical decoder backbone, training objective, optimizer, and data curriculum. Any performance difference is therefore attributable to the input modality only. Across all tested decoder backbones, the Vision-based model consistently outperforms the baseline, reaching a peak accuracy of 0.429 versus 0.355 for the index-based baseline—a 21% relative improvement—while converging in about half the number of training epochs. The advantage emerges especially within the first five epochs (under 21% of total data) and persists under moderate character corruption: the corrupted Vision model matches the clean index-based baseline. Ablation studies reveal that the advantage requires both spatially coherent input and a ViT encoder with 2D positional encodings. A cross-script comparison on English shows the advantage does not transfer directly to alphabetic writing systems, suggesting that the uniform visual density and radical structure of Chinese characters are enabling conditions. These findings suggest that transformers are more modality-agnostic than commonly assumed, and that discrete tokenization is not a fundamental requirement for Chinese language modeling.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.mrl-1.3/
%P 27-36
Markdown (Informal)
[One Image, No Tokens: A Controlled Study of Glyph-Based Chinese Language Modeling](https://aclanthology.org/2026.mrl-1.3/) (Xiang & Guan, MRL 2026)
ACL