@inproceedings{dutta-moharir-2026-solias,
title = "{SOLIAS}: A Reporting Standard for Social-Impact Claims in {NLP}",
author = "Dutta, Srimonti and
Moharir, Akshata Kishore",
editor = "Atwell, Katherine and
Borah, Angana and
Dementieva, Daryna and
Kreiss, Elisa and
Kotonya, Neema and
Liu, Jiarui and
Olson, Liz and
Wan, Ruyuan and
Zhao, Jieyu",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on {NLP} for Positive Impact ({NLP}4{PI})",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlp4pi-1.35/",
pages = "435--451",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-495-8",
abstract = "Socially motivated NLP research often connects technical contributions to intended benefits for people, institutions, or communities. The outcome invoked in a paper{'}s motivation, however, is not always the outcome evaluated in the study. This makes it difficult to determine what a result establishes, which transitions in the impact pathway remain assumptions, and how evidence should accumulate across technical, user, operational, and social studies. We introduce SOLIAS, Social Outcomes for Language-Integrated AI Systems, a reporting standard for social-impact claims in NLP. SOLIAS has three linked components: six evidence levels that identify the highest outcome layer directly evaluated, a claim-evidence alignment measure that relates conclusions to demonstrated outcomes, and a 20-item checklist for reporting populations, contexts, mechanisms, evaluation, safeguards, maintenance, and claim scope. In a retrospective audit of a multi-domain corpus of 168 research papers, demonstrated evidence is concentrated at the technical layer: 97.6{\%} of papers are classified at Level 0, while 35.7{\%} have a claim{--}evidence gap of at least two outcome layers. The audit illustrates how SOLIAS distinguishes valuable technical work from evidence about downstream outcomes without treating either as a substitute for the other. We release author and reviewer templates, operational definitions, worked examples, and a machine-readable schema to support adoption. SOLIAS is intended to make the scope of evidence explicit and to support research in which technical, user, institutional, and social outcomes are evaluated cumulatively."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="dutta-moharir-2026-solias">
<titleInfo>
<title>SOLIAS: A Reporting Standard for Social-Impact Claims in NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Srimonti</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dutta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Akshata</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kishore</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Moharir</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Katherine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Atwell</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Angana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Borah</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Daryna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dementieva</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Elisa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kreiss</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Neema</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kotonya</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jiarui</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Liz</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Olson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ruyuan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jieyu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-495-8</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Socially motivated NLP research often connects technical contributions to intended benefits for people, institutions, or communities. The outcome invoked in a paper’s motivation, however, is not always the outcome evaluated in the study. This makes it difficult to determine what a result establishes, which transitions in the impact pathway remain assumptions, and how evidence should accumulate across technical, user, operational, and social studies. We introduce SOLIAS, Social Outcomes for Language-Integrated AI Systems, a reporting standard for social-impact claims in NLP. SOLIAS has three linked components: six evidence levels that identify the highest outcome layer directly evaluated, a claim-evidence alignment measure that relates conclusions to demonstrated outcomes, and a 20-item checklist for reporting populations, contexts, mechanisms, evaluation, safeguards, maintenance, and claim scope. In a retrospective audit of a multi-domain corpus of 168 research papers, demonstrated evidence is concentrated at the technical layer: 97.6% of papers are classified at Level 0, while 35.7% have a claim–evidence gap of at least two outcome layers. The audit illustrates how SOLIAS distinguishes valuable technical work from evidence about downstream outcomes without treating either as a substitute for the other. We release author and reviewer templates, operational definitions, worked examples, and a machine-readable schema to support adoption. SOLIAS is intended to make the scope of evidence explicit and to support research in which technical, user, institutional, and social outcomes are evaluated cumulatively.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">dutta-moharir-2026-solias</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlp4pi-1.35/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>435</start>
<end>451</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T SOLIAS: A Reporting Standard for Social-Impact Claims in NLP
%A Dutta, Srimonti
%A Moharir, Akshata Kishore
%Y Atwell, Katherine
%Y Borah, Angana
%Y Dementieva, Daryna
%Y Kreiss, Elisa
%Y Kotonya, Neema
%Y Liu, Jiarui
%Y Olson, Liz
%Y Wan, Ruyuan
%Y Zhao, Jieyu
%S Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on NLP for Positive Impact (NLP4PI)
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-495-8
%F dutta-moharir-2026-solias
%X Socially motivated NLP research often connects technical contributions to intended benefits for people, institutions, or communities. The outcome invoked in a paper’s motivation, however, is not always the outcome evaluated in the study. This makes it difficult to determine what a result establishes, which transitions in the impact pathway remain assumptions, and how evidence should accumulate across technical, user, operational, and social studies. We introduce SOLIAS, Social Outcomes for Language-Integrated AI Systems, a reporting standard for social-impact claims in NLP. SOLIAS has three linked components: six evidence levels that identify the highest outcome layer directly evaluated, a claim-evidence alignment measure that relates conclusions to demonstrated outcomes, and a 20-item checklist for reporting populations, contexts, mechanisms, evaluation, safeguards, maintenance, and claim scope. In a retrospective audit of a multi-domain corpus of 168 research papers, demonstrated evidence is concentrated at the technical layer: 97.6% of papers are classified at Level 0, while 35.7% have a claim–evidence gap of at least two outcome layers. The audit illustrates how SOLIAS distinguishes valuable technical work from evidence about downstream outcomes without treating either as a substitute for the other. We release author and reviewer templates, operational definitions, worked examples, and a machine-readable schema to support adoption. SOLIAS is intended to make the scope of evidence explicit and to support research in which technical, user, institutional, and social outcomes are evaluated cumulatively.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlp4pi-1.35/
%P 435-451
Markdown (Informal)
[SOLIAS: A Reporting Standard for Social-Impact Claims in NLP](https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlp4pi-1.35/) (Dutta & Moharir, NLP4PI 2026)
ACL