@inproceedings{alotaibi-etal-2026-partner,
title = "Partner Attribution Bias in {LLM}-Assisted Export Control Screening",
author = "Alotaibi, Salem and
Lisitsa, Alexei and
McCabe, Antony",
editor = "Mitkov, Ruslan and
Mu{\~n}oz, Rafael and
Lloret, Elena and
Ranasinghe, Tharindu and
Estevanell-Valladares, Ernesto L. and
Lamsiyah, Salima and
Montoyo, Andr{\'e}s and
Ezzini, Saad",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security",
month = jun,
year = "2026",
address = "Alicante, Spain",
publisher = "Department of Languages and Information Systems, University of Alicante",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlpaics-1.26/",
pages = "244--252",
abstract = "Abstract Automating export control screening with large language models (LLMs) introduces risks of contextual sensitivity to non-technical signals, including partner country identity. This paper presents a reproducible counterfactual framework for diagnosing how partner country information influences LLM compliance decisions across five instruction-tuned models and 249 jurisdictions. Across four controlled experiments, partner identity systematically alters export control classifications even when project content is held constant or removed entirely, with BRICS and GCC partners attracting consistently higher control rates than EU and Five Eyes collaborations. Under causal partner controls, classification deltas become small and statistically non-significant, suggesting that observed disparities reflect contextual cue sensitivity rather than fixed geopolitical bias, though residual associative priors cannot be fully excluded. Model-level analysis reveals qualitatively distinct behavioural patterns, including directionally opposite responses to identical inputs across architectures, indicating that model selection carries consequences beyond accuracy in compliance-sensitive deployments. A structured two-stage prompting protocol reduces decision volatility by 60{--}80{\%} while preserving interpretability. The proposed framework provides an auditable diagnostic method for evaluating contextual sensitivity in regulated AI systems and offers practical guidance for accountable compliance automation."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="alotaibi-etal-2026-partner">
<titleInfo>
<title>Partner Attribution Bias in LLM-Assisted Export Control Screening</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Salem</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alotaibi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alexei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lisitsa</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Antony</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McCabe</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ruslan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mitkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rafael</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Muñoz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Elena</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lloret</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tharindu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ranasinghe</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ernesto</namePart>
<namePart type="given">L</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Estevanell-Valladares</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Salima</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lamsiyah</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andrés</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Montoyo</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Saad</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ezzini</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Department of Languages and Information Systems, University of Alicante</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Alicante, Spain</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Abstract Automating export control screening with large language models (LLMs) introduces risks of contextual sensitivity to non-technical signals, including partner country identity. This paper presents a reproducible counterfactual framework for diagnosing how partner country information influences LLM compliance decisions across five instruction-tuned models and 249 jurisdictions. Across four controlled experiments, partner identity systematically alters export control classifications even when project content is held constant or removed entirely, with BRICS and GCC partners attracting consistently higher control rates than EU and Five Eyes collaborations. Under causal partner controls, classification deltas become small and statistically non-significant, suggesting that observed disparities reflect contextual cue sensitivity rather than fixed geopolitical bias, though residual associative priors cannot be fully excluded. Model-level analysis reveals qualitatively distinct behavioural patterns, including directionally opposite responses to identical inputs across architectures, indicating that model selection carries consequences beyond accuracy in compliance-sensitive deployments. A structured two-stage prompting protocol reduces decision volatility by 60–80% while preserving interpretability. The proposed framework provides an auditable diagnostic method for evaluating contextual sensitivity in regulated AI systems and offers practical guidance for accountable compliance automation.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">alotaibi-etal-2026-partner</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlpaics-1.26/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>244</start>
<end>252</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Partner Attribution Bias in LLM-Assisted Export Control Screening
%A Alotaibi, Salem
%A Lisitsa, Alexei
%A McCabe, Antony
%Y Mitkov, Ruslan
%Y Muñoz, Rafael
%Y Lloret, Elena
%Y Ranasinghe, Tharindu
%Y Estevanell-Valladares, Ernesto L.
%Y Lamsiyah, Salima
%Y Montoyo, Andrés
%Y Ezzini, Saad
%S Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security
%D 2026
%8 June
%I Department of Languages and Information Systems, University of Alicante
%C Alicante, Spain
%F alotaibi-etal-2026-partner
%X Abstract Automating export control screening with large language models (LLMs) introduces risks of contextual sensitivity to non-technical signals, including partner country identity. This paper presents a reproducible counterfactual framework for diagnosing how partner country information influences LLM compliance decisions across five instruction-tuned models and 249 jurisdictions. Across four controlled experiments, partner identity systematically alters export control classifications even when project content is held constant or removed entirely, with BRICS and GCC partners attracting consistently higher control rates than EU and Five Eyes collaborations. Under causal partner controls, classification deltas become small and statistically non-significant, suggesting that observed disparities reflect contextual cue sensitivity rather than fixed geopolitical bias, though residual associative priors cannot be fully excluded. Model-level analysis reveals qualitatively distinct behavioural patterns, including directionally opposite responses to identical inputs across architectures, indicating that model selection carries consequences beyond accuracy in compliance-sensitive deployments. A structured two-stage prompting protocol reduces decision volatility by 60–80% while preserving interpretability. The proposed framework provides an auditable diagnostic method for evaluating contextual sensitivity in regulated AI systems and offers practical guidance for accountable compliance automation.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlpaics-1.26/
%P 244-252
Markdown (Informal)
[Partner Attribution Bias in LLM-Assisted Export Control Screening](https://aclanthology.org/2026.nlpaics-1.26/) (Alotaibi et al., NLPAICS 2026)
ACL
- Salem Alotaibi, Alexei Lisitsa, and Antony McCabe. 2026. Partner Attribution Bias in LLM-Assisted Export Control Screening. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security, pages 244–252, Alicante, Spain. Department of Languages and Information Systems, University of Alicante.