@inproceedings{alkan-etal-2026-lexical,
title = "Do Lexical and Contextual Coreference Resolution Systems Degrade Differently under Mention Noise? An Empirical Study on Scientific Software Mentions",
author = "Alkan, Atilla Kaan and
Grezes, Felix and
Bartlett, Jennifer Lynn and
Kelbert, Anna and
Lockhart, Kelly and
Accomazzi, Alberto",
editor = "Rehm, Georg and
Dietze, Stefan and
Dessi, Danilo and
Maynard, Diana and
Schimmler, Sonja",
booktitle = "Proceedings of Natural Scientific Language Processing ({NSLP}) @ {LREC} 2026",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma, Mallorca (Spain)",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.nslp-1.10/",
doi = "10.63317/2f5gzhatrnue",
pages = "97--107",
abstract = "We present our participation in the SOMD 2026 shared task on cross-document software mention coreference resolution, where our systems ranked second across all three subtasks. We compare two fine-tuning-free approaches: Fuzzy Matching (FM), a lexical string-similarity method, and Context Aware Representations (CAR), which combines mention-level and document-level embeddings. Both achieve competitive performance across all subtasks (CoNLL{~}F{1} of 0.94{--}0.96), with CAR consistently outperforming FM by 1 point on the official test set, consistent with the high surface regularity of software names, which reduces the need for complex semantic reasoning. A controlled noise-injection study reveals complementary failure modes: as boundary noise increases, CAR loses only 0.07 F{1} points from clean to fully corrupted input, compared to 0.20 for FM, whereas under mention substitution, FM degrades more gracefully (0.52 vs. 0.63). Our inference-time analysis shows that FM scales superlinearly with corpus size, whereas CAR scales approximately linearly, making CAR the more efficient choice at large scale. These findings suggest that system selection should be informed by both the noise profile of the upstream mention detector and the scale of the target corpus. We release our code to support future work on this underexplored task."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="alkan-etal-2026-lexical">
<titleInfo>
<title>Do Lexical and Contextual Coreference Resolution Systems Degrade Differently under Mention Noise? An Empirical Study on Scientific Software Mentions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Atilla</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kaan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alkan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Felix</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Grezes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jennifer</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Lynn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bartlett</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kelbert</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kelly</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lockhart</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alberto</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Accomazzi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of Natural Scientific Language Processing (NSLP) @ LREC 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Georg</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rehm</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dietze</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Danilo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dessi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Maynard</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sonja</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schimmler</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma, Mallorca (Spain)</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>We present our participation in the SOMD 2026 shared task on cross-document software mention coreference resolution, where our systems ranked second across all three subtasks. We compare two fine-tuning-free approaches: Fuzzy Matching (FM), a lexical string-similarity method, and Context Aware Representations (CAR), which combines mention-level and document-level embeddings. Both achieve competitive performance across all subtasks (CoNLL F1 of 0.94–0.96), with CAR consistently outperforming FM by 1 point on the official test set, consistent with the high surface regularity of software names, which reduces the need for complex semantic reasoning. A controlled noise-injection study reveals complementary failure modes: as boundary noise increases, CAR loses only 0.07 F1 points from clean to fully corrupted input, compared to 0.20 for FM, whereas under mention substitution, FM degrades more gracefully (0.52 vs. 0.63). Our inference-time analysis shows that FM scales superlinearly with corpus size, whereas CAR scales approximately linearly, making CAR the more efficient choice at large scale. These findings suggest that system selection should be informed by both the noise profile of the upstream mention detector and the scale of the target corpus. We release our code to support future work on this underexplored task.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">alkan-etal-2026-lexical</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/2f5gzhatrnue</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.nslp-1.10/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>97</start>
<end>107</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Do Lexical and Contextual Coreference Resolution Systems Degrade Differently under Mention Noise? An Empirical Study on Scientific Software Mentions
%A Alkan, Atilla Kaan
%A Grezes, Felix
%A Bartlett, Jennifer Lynn
%A Kelbert, Anna
%A Lockhart, Kelly
%A Accomazzi, Alberto
%Y Rehm, Georg
%Y Dietze, Stefan
%Y Dessi, Danilo
%Y Maynard, Diana
%Y Schimmler, Sonja
%S Proceedings of Natural Scientific Language Processing (NSLP) @ LREC 2026
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)
%C Palma, Mallorca (Spain)
%F alkan-etal-2026-lexical
%X We present our participation in the SOMD 2026 shared task on cross-document software mention coreference resolution, where our systems ranked second across all three subtasks. We compare two fine-tuning-free approaches: Fuzzy Matching (FM), a lexical string-similarity method, and Context Aware Representations (CAR), which combines mention-level and document-level embeddings. Both achieve competitive performance across all subtasks (CoNLL F1 of 0.94–0.96), with CAR consistently outperforming FM by 1 point on the official test set, consistent with the high surface regularity of software names, which reduces the need for complex semantic reasoning. A controlled noise-injection study reveals complementary failure modes: as boundary noise increases, CAR loses only 0.07 F1 points from clean to fully corrupted input, compared to 0.20 for FM, whereas under mention substitution, FM degrades more gracefully (0.52 vs. 0.63). Our inference-time analysis shows that FM scales superlinearly with corpus size, whereas CAR scales approximately linearly, making CAR the more efficient choice at large scale. These findings suggest that system selection should be informed by both the noise profile of the upstream mention detector and the scale of the target corpus. We release our code to support future work on this underexplored task.
%R 10.63317/2f5gzhatrnue
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.nslp-1.10/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/2f5gzhatrnue
%P 97-107
Markdown (Informal)
[Do Lexical and Contextual Coreference Resolution Systems Degrade Differently under Mention Noise? An Empirical Study on Scientific Software Mentions](https://aclanthology.org/2026.nslp-1.10/) (Alkan et al., NSLP 2026)
ACL