@inproceedings{channa-etal-2026-country,
title = "Country Is Not Enough: Recognition Action Gaps in Cultural Answerability",
author = "Channa, Aditya and
Kapoor, Madhav and
Singh, Jastej",
editor = "Ranaldi, Leonardo and
Pucci, Giulia and
Ranaldi, Federico and
Valentino, Marco and
Birch, Alexandra and
Zanzotto, Fabio Massimo",
booktitle = "The Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Reasoning Across Cultures Languages ({ORACLE})",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.oracle-main.11/",
pages = "166--176",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-483-5",
abstract = "Large language models increasingly answer culturally situated questions whose surface form specifies a country but omits the subnational, community or situational context needed for a reliable answer. We study cultural answerability: whether the cultural scope supplied by a user supports a direct answer without presenting one situated practice as a country-wide norm. Using region-specific evidence from I N DICA , we construct a bilingual English{--}Hindi evaluation with 50 culturally stable and 50 culturally dependent held out questions. We evaluate two multilingual LLMs across three stages: explicit recognition of missing context, natural response policy, and paired regional counterfactual grounding. Models identify 89.5{\%} of dependent conditions but correctly classify only 28.0{\%} of stable conditions, revealing strong over detection of cultural dependence. Under natural assistance, the appropriate policy rate on dependent questions is 69.0{\%}, while 30.5{\%} of responses make an unscoped cultural commitment. Moreover in 28.0{\%} of dependent model language conditions a model explicitly recognises missing context yet still makes such a commitment when answering naturally. Human adjudicated regional grounding succeeds in only 13.5{\%} of paired conditions, showing that explicit regional context does not reliably produce grounded adaptation. These results show that cultural reliability is not primarily a knowledge problem: it is a calibration problem spanning recognition, response policy and grounded adaptation."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="channa-etal-2026-country">
<titleInfo>
<title>Country Is Not Enough: Recognition Action Gaps in Cultural Answerability</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Aditya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Channa</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Madhav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kapoor</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jastej</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Singh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Reasoning Across Cultures Languages (ORACLE)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Leonardo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ranaldi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giulia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pucci</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Federico</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ranaldi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marco</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Valentino</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alexandra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Birch</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Fabio</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Massimo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zanzotto</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-483-5</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Large language models increasingly answer culturally situated questions whose surface form specifies a country but omits the subnational, community or situational context needed for a reliable answer. We study cultural answerability: whether the cultural scope supplied by a user supports a direct answer without presenting one situated practice as a country-wide norm. Using region-specific evidence from I N DICA , we construct a bilingual English–Hindi evaluation with 50 culturally stable and 50 culturally dependent held out questions. We evaluate two multilingual LLMs across three stages: explicit recognition of missing context, natural response policy, and paired regional counterfactual grounding. Models identify 89.5% of dependent conditions but correctly classify only 28.0% of stable conditions, revealing strong over detection of cultural dependence. Under natural assistance, the appropriate policy rate on dependent questions is 69.0%, while 30.5% of responses make an unscoped cultural commitment. Moreover in 28.0% of dependent model language conditions a model explicitly recognises missing context yet still makes such a commitment when answering naturally. Human adjudicated regional grounding succeeds in only 13.5% of paired conditions, showing that explicit regional context does not reliably produce grounded adaptation. These results show that cultural reliability is not primarily a knowledge problem: it is a calibration problem spanning recognition, response policy and grounded adaptation.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">channa-etal-2026-country</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.oracle-main.11/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>166</start>
<end>176</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Country Is Not Enough: Recognition Action Gaps in Cultural Answerability
%A Channa, Aditya
%A Kapoor, Madhav
%A Singh, Jastej
%Y Ranaldi, Leonardo
%Y Pucci, Giulia
%Y Ranaldi, Federico
%Y Valentino, Marco
%Y Birch, Alexandra
%Y Zanzotto, Fabio Massimo
%S The Proceedings of the Workshop on Open Reasoning Across Cultures Languages (ORACLE)
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-483-5
%F channa-etal-2026-country
%X Large language models increasingly answer culturally situated questions whose surface form specifies a country but omits the subnational, community or situational context needed for a reliable answer. We study cultural answerability: whether the cultural scope supplied by a user supports a direct answer without presenting one situated practice as a country-wide norm. Using region-specific evidence from I N DICA , we construct a bilingual English–Hindi evaluation with 50 culturally stable and 50 culturally dependent held out questions. We evaluate two multilingual LLMs across three stages: explicit recognition of missing context, natural response policy, and paired regional counterfactual grounding. Models identify 89.5% of dependent conditions but correctly classify only 28.0% of stable conditions, revealing strong over detection of cultural dependence. Under natural assistance, the appropriate policy rate on dependent questions is 69.0%, while 30.5% of responses make an unscoped cultural commitment. Moreover in 28.0% of dependent model language conditions a model explicitly recognises missing context yet still makes such a commitment when answering naturally. Human adjudicated regional grounding succeeds in only 13.5% of paired conditions, showing that explicit regional context does not reliably produce grounded adaptation. These results show that cultural reliability is not primarily a knowledge problem: it is a calibration problem spanning recognition, response policy and grounded adaptation.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.oracle-main.11/
%P 166-176
Markdown (Informal)
[Country Is Not Enough: Recognition Action Gaps in Cultural Answerability](https://aclanthology.org/2026.oracle-main.11/) (Channa et al., ORACLE 2026)
ACL