@inproceedings{roy-malhotra-2026-modusponens,
title = "{M}odus{P}onens at {S}em{E}val-2026 Task 11: Breaking the Plausibility Trap in {LLM}s via Conflict-Aware Ensembling",
author = "Roy, Soumyajit and
Malhotra, Manav",
editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina and
Ghosh, Debanjan and
North, Kai and
Komachi, Mamoru",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, USA",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.10/",
pages = "65--71",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
abstract = "Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to disentangle formal logical validity from real-world plausibility, a phenomenon known as the ``belief bias''. This paper describes our submission to SemEval-2026 Task 11. We frame the task as a calibration problem between ``System 1'' (heuristic) and ``System 2'' (logical) thinking. Our experiments reveal that standard neuro-symbolic interventions, such as Structural Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Nonsense Augmentation, degrade performance in low-resource regimes due to an ``abstraction penalty''. Instead, we propose a Conflict-Aware Logit Ensemble. We fine-tune two variations of Qwen-2.5-14B: a standard ``Believer'' model and a bias-hardened ``Skeptic'' model trained on oversampled conflict data. By ensembling their logits via soft-voting, we achieve a Pareto-optimal balance, reducing the Total Content Effect (TCE) to 3.21 while maintaining an overall accuracy of 94.27{\%}, resulting in a Combined Score of 39.09."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="roy-malhotra-2026-modusponens">
<titleInfo>
<title>ModusPonens at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Breaking the Plausibility Trap in LLMs via Conflict-Aware Ensembling</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Soumyajit</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Manav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Malhotra</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ekaterina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kochmar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Debanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ghosh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">North</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mamoru</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komachi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-414-9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to disentangle formal logical validity from real-world plausibility, a phenomenon known as the “belief bias”. This paper describes our submission to SemEval-2026 Task 11. We frame the task as a calibration problem between “System 1” (heuristic) and “System 2” (logical) thinking. Our experiments reveal that standard neuro-symbolic interventions, such as Structural Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Nonsense Augmentation, degrade performance in low-resource regimes due to an “abstraction penalty”. Instead, we propose a Conflict-Aware Logit Ensemble. We fine-tune two variations of Qwen-2.5-14B: a standard “Believer” model and a bias-hardened “Skeptic” model trained on oversampled conflict data. By ensembling their logits via soft-voting, we achieve a Pareto-optimal balance, reducing the Total Content Effect (TCE) to 3.21 while maintaining an overall accuracy of 94.27%, resulting in a Combined Score of 39.09.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">roy-malhotra-2026-modusponens</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.10/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>65</start>
<end>71</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T ModusPonens at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Breaking the Plausibility Trap in LLMs via Conflict-Aware Ensembling
%A Roy, Soumyajit
%A Malhotra, Manav
%Y Kochmar, Ekaterina
%Y Ghosh, Debanjan
%Y North, Kai
%Y Komachi, Mamoru
%S Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, USA
%@ 979-8-89176-414-9
%F roy-malhotra-2026-modusponens
%X Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle to disentangle formal logical validity from real-world plausibility, a phenomenon known as the “belief bias”. This paper describes our submission to SemEval-2026 Task 11. We frame the task as a calibration problem between “System 1” (heuristic) and “System 2” (logical) thinking. Our experiments reveal that standard neuro-symbolic interventions, such as Structural Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Nonsense Augmentation, degrade performance in low-resource regimes due to an “abstraction penalty”. Instead, we propose a Conflict-Aware Logit Ensemble. We fine-tune two variations of Qwen-2.5-14B: a standard “Believer” model and a bias-hardened “Skeptic” model trained on oversampled conflict data. By ensembling their logits via soft-voting, we achieve a Pareto-optimal balance, reducing the Total Content Effect (TCE) to 3.21 while maintaining an overall accuracy of 94.27%, resulting in a Combined Score of 39.09.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.10/
%P 65-71
Markdown (Informal)
[ModusPonens at SemEval-2026 Task 11: Breaking the Plausibility Trap in LLMs via Conflict-Aware Ensembling](https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.10/) (Roy & Malhotra, SemEval 2026)
ACL