@inproceedings{dinh-2026-one,
title = "One and Only at {S}em{E}val-2026 Task 2: Evaluating Zero-Shot Autonomous {LLM} Agents and Heuristic Proxies in Ecological Affect Forecasting",
author = "Dinh, Nam",
editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina and
Ghosh, Debanjan and
North, Kai and
Komachi, Mamoru",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, USA",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.162/",
pages = "1205--1211",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
abstract = "This paper presents team One and Only{'}s sys-tem for SemEval-2026 Task 2: PredictingVariation in Emotional Valence and Arousalover Time (Soni et al., 2026). We investigatewhether zero-shot LLM reasoning can replacefine-tuning for ecological affect forecasting bycombining deterministic statistical priors withfrozen LLMs (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus4.6, GPT-5.2). For short-term state changes(Subtask 2A), an OLS mean-reversion anchoris paired with LLM-generated impulses; forlong-term disposition changes (Subtask 2B),a Chain-of-Thought prompt drives direct nu-meric prediction. Our system underperformsfine-tuned approaches on both subtasks. How-ever, post-submission ablation across threeLLMs reveals a task-dependent pattern: CoTreasoning substantially improves dispositionforecasting (rV : {\ensuremath{-}}0.185 {\textrightarrow} +0.129; MAEV :0.899 {\textrightarrow} 0.422), while uncalibrated LLM im-pulses degrade state-change prediction due tovariance collapse ({\ensuremath{\sigma}}pred = 0.41 vs. {\ensuremath{\sigma}}gold =1.73). We provide a detailed diagnostic anal-ysis of these failure modes and release allprompts and outputs for reproducibility."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="dinh-2026-one">
<titleInfo>
<title>One and Only at SemEval-2026 Task 2: Evaluating Zero-Shot Autonomous LLM Agents and Heuristic Proxies in Ecological Affect Forecasting</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dinh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ekaterina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kochmar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Debanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ghosh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">North</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mamoru</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komachi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-414-9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper presents team One and Only’s sys-tem for SemEval-2026 Task 2: PredictingVariation in Emotional Valence and Arousalover Time (Soni et al., 2026). We investigatewhether zero-shot LLM reasoning can replacefine-tuning for ecological affect forecasting bycombining deterministic statistical priors withfrozen LLMs (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus4.6, GPT-5.2). For short-term state changes(Subtask 2A), an OLS mean-reversion anchoris paired with LLM-generated impulses; forlong-term disposition changes (Subtask 2B),a Chain-of-Thought prompt drives direct nu-meric prediction. Our system underperformsfine-tuned approaches on both subtasks. How-ever, post-submission ablation across threeLLMs reveals a task-dependent pattern: CoTreasoning substantially improves dispositionforecasting (rV : \ensuremath-0.185 → +0.129; MAEV :0.899 → 0.422), while uncalibrated LLM im-pulses degrade state-change prediction due tovariance collapse (\ensuremathσpred = 0.41 vs. \ensuremathσgold =1.73). We provide a detailed diagnostic anal-ysis of these failure modes and release allprompts and outputs for reproducibility.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">dinh-2026-one</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.162/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1205</start>
<end>1211</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T One and Only at SemEval-2026 Task 2: Evaluating Zero-Shot Autonomous LLM Agents and Heuristic Proxies in Ecological Affect Forecasting
%A Dinh, Nam
%Y Kochmar, Ekaterina
%Y Ghosh, Debanjan
%Y North, Kai
%Y Komachi, Mamoru
%S Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, USA
%@ 979-8-89176-414-9
%F dinh-2026-one
%X This paper presents team One and Only’s sys-tem for SemEval-2026 Task 2: PredictingVariation in Emotional Valence and Arousalover Time (Soni et al., 2026). We investigatewhether zero-shot LLM reasoning can replacefine-tuning for ecological affect forecasting bycombining deterministic statistical priors withfrozen LLMs (Gemini 3 Pro, Claude Opus4.6, GPT-5.2). For short-term state changes(Subtask 2A), an OLS mean-reversion anchoris paired with LLM-generated impulses; forlong-term disposition changes (Subtask 2B),a Chain-of-Thought prompt drives direct nu-meric prediction. Our system underperformsfine-tuned approaches on both subtasks. How-ever, post-submission ablation across threeLLMs reveals a task-dependent pattern: CoTreasoning substantially improves dispositionforecasting (rV : \ensuremath-0.185 → +0.129; MAEV :0.899 → 0.422), while uncalibrated LLM im-pulses degrade state-change prediction due tovariance collapse (\ensuremathσpred = 0.41 vs. \ensuremathσgold =1.73). We provide a detailed diagnostic anal-ysis of these failure modes and release allprompts and outputs for reproducibility.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.162/
%P 1205-1211
Markdown (Informal)
[One and Only at SemEval-2026 Task 2: Evaluating Zero-Shot Autonomous LLM Agents and Heuristic Proxies in Ecological Affect Forecasting](https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.162/) (Dinh, SemEval 2026)
ACL