@inproceedings{fariha-etal-2026-cuet320,
title = "{CUET}320 at {S}em{E}val-2026 Task 10: Few-Shot Large Language Models for Psycholinguistic Marker Extraction and Conspiracy Detection",
author = "Fariha, Faozia and
Khan, Lamia and
Chowdhury, Madiha Ahmed and
Ahmed, Kawsar and
Hoque, Mohammed Moshiul",
editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina and
Ghosh, Debanjan and
North, Kai and
Komachi, Mamoru",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, USA",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.432/",
pages = "3495--3507",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
abstract = "Conspiracy theories widely spread on social media and can harm society by increasing mistrust, vaccine hesitancy, and political radicalization. However, most automated detection systems have traditionally relied on topic-specific classifiers, which often struggle to generalize across domains and provide little explanation for why a text is considered conspiratorial. To address these limitations, this paper explores various LLMs on the SemEval-2026 Task 10: psycholinguistic conspiracy marker extraction and binary conspiracy detection from Reddit submission statements. Specifically, we adopt a training-free few-shot prompting approach using different instruction-tuned large language models under a variety of few-shot settings (k in {\{}0,1,5,10,15, 20{\}}). Within this framework, the proposed prompting strategy incorporates psychology-informed instructions to guide the models in identifying conspiracy-related signals. As a result, the presented system achieves an F1 score of 0.21 for marker extraction and 0.81 for conspiracy detection, ranking 16th out of 30 teams in Subtask{\textasciitilde}1 and 36th out of 52 in Subtask{\textasciitilde}2 without any task-specific fine-tuning. These results suggest that psycholinguistically grounded prompting can support interpretable conspiracy analysis; however, challenges remain in identifying implicit markers."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="fariha-etal-2026-cuet320">
<titleInfo>
<title>CUET320 at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Few-Shot Large Language Models for Psycholinguistic Marker Extraction and Conspiracy Detection</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Faozia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Fariha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lamia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Khan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Madiha</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Ahmed</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chowdhury</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kawsar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ahmed</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mohammed</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Moshiul</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hoque</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ekaterina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kochmar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Debanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ghosh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">North</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mamoru</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komachi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-414-9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Conspiracy theories widely spread on social media and can harm society by increasing mistrust, vaccine hesitancy, and political radicalization. However, most automated detection systems have traditionally relied on topic-specific classifiers, which often struggle to generalize across domains and provide little explanation for why a text is considered conspiratorial. To address these limitations, this paper explores various LLMs on the SemEval-2026 Task 10: psycholinguistic conspiracy marker extraction and binary conspiracy detection from Reddit submission statements. Specifically, we adopt a training-free few-shot prompting approach using different instruction-tuned large language models under a variety of few-shot settings (k in {0,1,5,10,15, 20}). Within this framework, the proposed prompting strategy incorporates psychology-informed instructions to guide the models in identifying conspiracy-related signals. As a result, the presented system achieves an F1 score of 0.21 for marker extraction and 0.81 for conspiracy detection, ranking 16th out of 30 teams in Subtask~1 and 36th out of 52 in Subtask~2 without any task-specific fine-tuning. These results suggest that psycholinguistically grounded prompting can support interpretable conspiracy analysis; however, challenges remain in identifying implicit markers.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">fariha-etal-2026-cuet320</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.432/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>3495</start>
<end>3507</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T CUET320 at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Few-Shot Large Language Models for Psycholinguistic Marker Extraction and Conspiracy Detection
%A Fariha, Faozia
%A Khan, Lamia
%A Chowdhury, Madiha Ahmed
%A Ahmed, Kawsar
%A Hoque, Mohammed Moshiul
%Y Kochmar, Ekaterina
%Y Ghosh, Debanjan
%Y North, Kai
%Y Komachi, Mamoru
%S Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, USA
%@ 979-8-89176-414-9
%F fariha-etal-2026-cuet320
%X Conspiracy theories widely spread on social media and can harm society by increasing mistrust, vaccine hesitancy, and political radicalization. However, most automated detection systems have traditionally relied on topic-specific classifiers, which often struggle to generalize across domains and provide little explanation for why a text is considered conspiratorial. To address these limitations, this paper explores various LLMs on the SemEval-2026 Task 10: psycholinguistic conspiracy marker extraction and binary conspiracy detection from Reddit submission statements. Specifically, we adopt a training-free few-shot prompting approach using different instruction-tuned large language models under a variety of few-shot settings (k in {0,1,5,10,15, 20}). Within this framework, the proposed prompting strategy incorporates psychology-informed instructions to guide the models in identifying conspiracy-related signals. As a result, the presented system achieves an F1 score of 0.21 for marker extraction and 0.81 for conspiracy detection, ranking 16th out of 30 teams in Subtask~1 and 36th out of 52 in Subtask~2 without any task-specific fine-tuning. These results suggest that psycholinguistically grounded prompting can support interpretable conspiracy analysis; however, challenges remain in identifying implicit markers.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.432/
%P 3495-3507Markdown (Informal)
[CUET320 at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Few-Shot Large Language Models for Psycholinguistic Marker Extraction and Conspiracy Detection](https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.432/) (Fariha et al., SemEval 2026)
ACL