@inproceedings{adam-etal-2026-team,
title = "Team {H}ausa{NLP} at {S}em{E}val-2026 Task 4: Narratives via Semantic Embeddings",
author = "Adam, Faisal and
Aliyu, Lukman and
Aji, Sani",
editor = "Kochmar, Ekaterina and
Ghosh, Debanjan and
North, Kai and
Komachi, Mamoru",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 20th {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {S}emantic {E}valuation (2026)",
month = jul,
year = "2026",
address = "San Diego, California, USA",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.7/",
pages = "48--53",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-414-9",
abstract = "This paper presents Team HausaNLP{'}s submission to SemEval-2026 Task 4 (Track A),which requires identifying the more narrativelysimilar of two candidate stories relative to ananchor. Narrative similarity is defined alongthree dimensions: abstract theme, course ofaction, and story outcomes. We conduct a systematic ablation comparing five approaches:a lexical TF-IDF baseline, two bi-encoderSBERT variants (all-MiniLM-L6-v2 andall-mpnet-base-v2), a paraphrase-focusedembedding model, and a cross-encoder reranker. On the 200-instance development set,all-mpnet-base-v2 achieves the best performance (61.5{\%} accuracy, 61.48 macro-F1), outperforming both TF-IDF (54.5{\%}) and the official SBERT baseline (55.0{\%}). Surprisingly,the cross-encoder re-ranker (55.5{\%}) does notimprove on the bi-encoders, which we attributeto the long-document nature of Wikipedia storysummaries exceeding the model{'}s effective context window. On the official test set, our primary SBERT MiniLM submission achieved61.50{\%} accuracy (33rd of 44 teams). Our erroranalysis over 200 development instances identifies five systematic failure categories, distinctfrom the All Correct / Partial cases, including23 Lexical Trap cases, 23 Hard Cases, and 24Proposed-Recovery cases, thereby informingconcrete directions for future work."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="adam-etal-2026-team">
<titleInfo>
<title>Team HausaNLP at SemEval-2026 Task 4: Narratives via Semantic Embeddings</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Faisal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Adam</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lukman</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Aliyu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sani</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Aji</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ekaterina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kochmar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Debanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ghosh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kai</namePart>
<namePart type="family">North</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mamoru</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komachi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-414-9</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper presents Team HausaNLP’s submission to SemEval-2026 Task 4 (Track A),which requires identifying the more narrativelysimilar of two candidate stories relative to ananchor. Narrative similarity is defined alongthree dimensions: abstract theme, course ofaction, and story outcomes. We conduct a systematic ablation comparing five approaches:a lexical TF-IDF baseline, two bi-encoderSBERT variants (all-MiniLM-L6-v2 andall-mpnet-base-v2), a paraphrase-focusedembedding model, and a cross-encoder reranker. On the 200-instance development set,all-mpnet-base-v2 achieves the best performance (61.5% accuracy, 61.48 macro-F1), outperforming both TF-IDF (54.5%) and the official SBERT baseline (55.0%). Surprisingly,the cross-encoder re-ranker (55.5%) does notimprove on the bi-encoders, which we attributeto the long-document nature of Wikipedia storysummaries exceeding the model’s effective context window. On the official test set, our primary SBERT MiniLM submission achieved61.50% accuracy (33rd of 44 teams). Our erroranalysis over 200 development instances identifies five systematic failure categories, distinctfrom the All Correct / Partial cases, including23 Lexical Trap cases, 23 Hard Cases, and 24Proposed-Recovery cases, thereby informingconcrete directions for future work.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">adam-etal-2026-team</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.7/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>48</start>
<end>53</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Team HausaNLP at SemEval-2026 Task 4: Narratives via Semantic Embeddings
%A Adam, Faisal
%A Aliyu, Lukman
%A Aji, Sani
%Y Kochmar, Ekaterina
%Y Ghosh, Debanjan
%Y North, Kai
%Y Komachi, Mamoru
%S Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (2026)
%D 2026
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C San Diego, California, USA
%@ 979-8-89176-414-9
%F adam-etal-2026-team
%X This paper presents Team HausaNLP’s submission to SemEval-2026 Task 4 (Track A),which requires identifying the more narrativelysimilar of two candidate stories relative to ananchor. Narrative similarity is defined alongthree dimensions: abstract theme, course ofaction, and story outcomes. We conduct a systematic ablation comparing five approaches:a lexical TF-IDF baseline, two bi-encoderSBERT variants (all-MiniLM-L6-v2 andall-mpnet-base-v2), a paraphrase-focusedembedding model, and a cross-encoder reranker. On the 200-instance development set,all-mpnet-base-v2 achieves the best performance (61.5% accuracy, 61.48 macro-F1), outperforming both TF-IDF (54.5%) and the official SBERT baseline (55.0%). Surprisingly,the cross-encoder re-ranker (55.5%) does notimprove on the bi-encoders, which we attributeto the long-document nature of Wikipedia storysummaries exceeding the model’s effective context window. On the official test set, our primary SBERT MiniLM submission achieved61.50% accuracy (33rd of 44 teams). Our erroranalysis over 200 development instances identifies five systematic failure categories, distinctfrom the All Correct / Partial cases, including23 Lexical Trap cases, 23 Hard Cases, and 24Proposed-Recovery cases, thereby informingconcrete directions for future work.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.7/
%P 48-53
Markdown (Informal)
[Team HausaNLP at SemEval-2026 Task 4: Narratives via Semantic Embeddings](https://aclanthology.org/2026.semeval-1.7/) (Adam et al., SemEval 2026)
ACL