@inproceedings{danilevskyi-etal-2026-addressing,
title = "Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation",
author = "Danilevskyi, Mykhailo and
Perez-Tellez, Fernando and
Vasic, Jelena",
editor = "Hosseini-Kivanani, Nina and
Brutti, Alessio and
Matassoni, Marco and
Dowerah, Sandipana and
Liga, Davide and
Schommer, Christoph",
booktitle = "Proceedings of Speech Language Models in Low-Resource Settings: Performance, Evaluation, and Bias Analysis ({SPEAKABLE}) @ {LREC} 2026",
month = may,
year = "2026",
address = "Palma, Mallorca (Spain)",
publisher = "ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.speakable-1.9/",
doi = "10.63317/3zjiz9fsk4fy",
pages = "79--85",
abstract = "Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often exhibit uneven performance across accents, raising concerns about fairness and bias. This study investigates the impact of model fine-tuning strategies on ASR performance and accent-related disparities. We conduct a controlled empirical evaluation of two adaptation approaches{---}single-step and two-step fine-tuning{---}using pretrained Whisper (small) and Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 models on African-accented English speech from the AfriSpeech-200 dataset, covering Yoruba, Igbo, Swahili, and Hausa accents. Both fine-tuning strategies substantially reduced mean word error rate (WER) for all models. However, these improvements did not translate into consistent reductions in accent-related performance gaps. When analysed separately across general and clinical subsets, WER gaps often increased due to uneven gains across accents. Although two-step fine-tuning provided modest improvements over single-step adaptation, its impact on reducing disparities remained limited. These findings indicate that fine-tuning primarily optimises performance without effectively addressing systematic bias across speaker groups, even when models are specialised for individual accents. This highlights the limitations of per-accent specialisation as a practical bias mitigation strategy."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="danilevskyi-etal-2026-addressing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mykhailo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Danilevskyi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Fernando</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Perez-Tellez</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jelena</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vasic</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of Speech Language Models in Low-Resource Settings: Performance, Evaluation, and Bias Analysis (SPEAKABLE) @ LREC 2026</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hosseini-Kivanani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alessio</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Brutti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marco</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Matassoni</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sandipana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dowerah</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Davide</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liga</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christoph</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schommer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Palma, Mallorca (Spain)</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often exhibit uneven performance across accents, raising concerns about fairness and bias. This study investigates the impact of model fine-tuning strategies on ASR performance and accent-related disparities. We conduct a controlled empirical evaluation of two adaptation approaches—single-step and two-step fine-tuning—using pretrained Whisper (small) and Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 models on African-accented English speech from the AfriSpeech-200 dataset, covering Yoruba, Igbo, Swahili, and Hausa accents. Both fine-tuning strategies substantially reduced mean word error rate (WER) for all models. However, these improvements did not translate into consistent reductions in accent-related performance gaps. When analysed separately across general and clinical subsets, WER gaps often increased due to uneven gains across accents. Although two-step fine-tuning provided modest improvements over single-step adaptation, its impact on reducing disparities remained limited. These findings indicate that fine-tuning primarily optimises performance without effectively addressing systematic bias across speaker groups, even when models are specialised for individual accents. This highlights the limitations of per-accent specialisation as a practical bias mitigation strategy.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">danilevskyi-etal-2026-addressing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.63317/3zjiz9fsk4fy</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.speakable-1.9/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>79</start>
<end>85</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation
%A Danilevskyi, Mykhailo
%A Perez-Tellez, Fernando
%A Vasic, Jelena
%Y Hosseini-Kivanani, Nina
%Y Brutti, Alessio
%Y Matassoni, Marco
%Y Dowerah, Sandipana
%Y Liga, Davide
%Y Schommer, Christoph
%S Proceedings of Speech Language Models in Low-Resource Settings: Performance, Evaluation, and Bias Analysis (SPEAKABLE) @ LREC 2026
%D 2026
%8 May
%I ELRA Language Resources Association (ELRA)
%C Palma, Mallorca (Spain)
%F danilevskyi-etal-2026-addressing
%X Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often exhibit uneven performance across accents, raising concerns about fairness and bias. This study investigates the impact of model fine-tuning strategies on ASR performance and accent-related disparities. We conduct a controlled empirical evaluation of two adaptation approaches—single-step and two-step fine-tuning—using pretrained Whisper (small) and Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 models on African-accented English speech from the AfriSpeech-200 dataset, covering Yoruba, Igbo, Swahili, and Hausa accents. Both fine-tuning strategies substantially reduced mean word error rate (WER) for all models. However, these improvements did not translate into consistent reductions in accent-related performance gaps. When analysed separately across general and clinical subsets, WER gaps often increased due to uneven gains across accents. Although two-step fine-tuning provided modest improvements over single-step adaptation, its impact on reducing disparities remained limited. These findings indicate that fine-tuning primarily optimises performance without effectively addressing systematic bias across speaker groups, even when models are specialised for individual accents. This highlights the limitations of per-accent specialisation as a practical bias mitigation strategy.
%R 10.63317/3zjiz9fsk4fy
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.speakable-1.9/
%U https://doi.org/10.63317/3zjiz9fsk4fy
%P 79-85
Markdown (Informal)
[Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation](https://aclanthology.org/2026.speakable-1.9/) (Danilevskyi et al., SPEAKABLE 2026)
ACL