@article{leiter-etal-2026-croc,
title = "{CROC}: Evaluating and Training {T}2{I} Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checks",
author = "Leiter, Christoph and
Asano, Yuki M. and
Keuper, Margret and
Eger, Steffen",
journal = "Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
volume = "14",
year = "2026",
address = "Cambridge, MA",
publisher = "MIT Press",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1.50/",
doi = "10.1162/tacl.a.699",
pages = "1119--1139",
abstract = "The assessment of evaluation metrics (meta-evaluation) is crucial for determining the suitability of existing metrics in text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Human-based meta-evaluation is costly and time-intensive, and automated alternatives are scarce. We address this gap and propose CROC: a scalable framework for automated Contrastive Robustness Checks that systematically probes and quantifies metric robustness by synthesizing contrastive test cases across a comprehensive taxonomy of image properties. With CROC, we generate a pseudo-labeled dataset (CROCsyn) of over 1 million contrastive prompt{--}image pairs to enable a fine-grained comparison of evaluation metrics. We also use this dataset to train CROCScore, a new metric that achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source methods, demonstrating an additional key application of our framework. To complement this dataset, we introduce a human-supervised benchmark (CROChum) targeting especially challenging categories. Our results highlight robustness issues in existing metrics: for example, many fail on prompts involving negation, and all tested open-source metrics fail on at least 24{\%} of cases involving correct identification of body parts.1"
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="leiter-etal-2026-croc">
<titleInfo>
<title>CROC: Evaluating and Training T2I Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checks</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christoph</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Leiter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuki</namePart>
<namePart type="given">M</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Asano</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Margret</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Keuper</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Steffen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Eger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>MIT Press</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, MA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The assessment of evaluation metrics (meta-evaluation) is crucial for determining the suitability of existing metrics in text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Human-based meta-evaluation is costly and time-intensive, and automated alternatives are scarce. We address this gap and propose CROC: a scalable framework for automated Contrastive Robustness Checks that systematically probes and quantifies metric robustness by synthesizing contrastive test cases across a comprehensive taxonomy of image properties. With CROC, we generate a pseudo-labeled dataset (CROCsyn) of over 1 million contrastive prompt–image pairs to enable a fine-grained comparison of evaluation metrics. We also use this dataset to train CROCScore, a new metric that achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source methods, demonstrating an additional key application of our framework. To complement this dataset, we introduce a human-supervised benchmark (CROChum) targeting especially challenging categories. Our results highlight robustness issues in existing metrics: for example, many fail on prompts involving negation, and all tested open-source metrics fail on at least 24% of cases involving correct identification of body parts.1</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">leiter-etal-2026-croc</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1162/tacl.a.699</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1.50/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>14</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1119</start>
<end>1139</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T CROC: Evaluating and Training T2I Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checks
%A Leiter, Christoph
%A Asano, Yuki M.
%A Keuper, Margret
%A Eger, Steffen
%J Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2026
%V 14
%I MIT Press
%C Cambridge, MA
%F leiter-etal-2026-croc
%X The assessment of evaluation metrics (meta-evaluation) is crucial for determining the suitability of existing metrics in text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Human-based meta-evaluation is costly and time-intensive, and automated alternatives are scarce. We address this gap and propose CROC: a scalable framework for automated Contrastive Robustness Checks that systematically probes and quantifies metric robustness by synthesizing contrastive test cases across a comprehensive taxonomy of image properties. With CROC, we generate a pseudo-labeled dataset (CROCsyn) of over 1 million contrastive prompt–image pairs to enable a fine-grained comparison of evaluation metrics. We also use this dataset to train CROCScore, a new metric that achieves state-of-the-art performance among open-source methods, demonstrating an additional key application of our framework. To complement this dataset, we introduce a human-supervised benchmark (CROChum) targeting especially challenging categories. Our results highlight robustness issues in existing metrics: for example, many fail on prompts involving negation, and all tested open-source metrics fail on at least 24% of cases involving correct identification of body parts.1
%R 10.1162/tacl.a.699
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1.50/
%U https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl.a.699
%P 1119-1139
Markdown (Informal)
[CROC: Evaluating and Training T2I Metrics with Pseudo- and Human-Labeled Contrastive Robustness Checks](https://aclanthology.org/2026.tacl-1.50/) (Leiter et al., TACL 2026)
ACL