@inproceedings{gautam-2026-teaching-critiquing,
title = "Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in {NLP}",
author = "Gautam, Vagrant",
editor = {A{\ss}enmacher, Matthias and
Biester, Laura and
Borg, Claudia and
Kov{\'a}cs, Gy{\"o}rgy and
Mieskes, Margot and
Serrano, Sofia},
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing ({T}each{NLP} 2026)",
month = mar,
year = "2026",
address = "Rabat, Morocco",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.teachingnlp-1.11/",
pages = "69--77",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-375-3",
abstract = "NLP researchers regularly invoke abstract concepts like ``interpretability,'' ``bias,'' ``reasoning,'' and ``stereotypes,'' without defining them.Each subfield has a shared understanding or conceptualization of what these terms mean and how we should treat them, and this shared understanding is the basis on which operational decisions are made:Datasets are built to evaluate these concepts, metrics are proposed to quantify them, and claims are made about systems. But what do they mean, what {\_}should{\_} they mean, and how should we measure them?I outline a seminar I created for students to explore these questions of conceptualization and operationalization, with an interdisciplinary reading list and an emphasis on discussion and critique."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gautam-2026-teaching-critiquing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vagrant</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gautam</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-03</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing (TeachNLP 2026)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Matthias</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Aßenmacher</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laura</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Biester</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Claudia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Borg</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">György</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kovács</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Margot</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mieskes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sofia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Serrano</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Rabat, Morocco</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-375-3</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>NLP researchers regularly invoke abstract concepts like “interpretability,” “bias,” “reasoning,” and “stereotypes,” without defining them.Each subfield has a shared understanding or conceptualization of what these terms mean and how we should treat them, and this shared understanding is the basis on which operational decisions are made:Datasets are built to evaluate these concepts, metrics are proposed to quantify them, and claims are made about systems. But what do they mean, what _should_ they mean, and how should we measure them?I outline a seminar I created for students to explore these questions of conceptualization and operationalization, with an interdisciplinary reading list and an emphasis on discussion and critique.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">gautam-2026-teaching-critiquing</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.teachingnlp-1.11/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-03</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>69</start>
<end>77</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP
%A Gautam, Vagrant
%Y Aßenmacher, Matthias
%Y Biester, Laura
%Y Borg, Claudia
%Y Kovács, György
%Y Mieskes, Margot
%Y Serrano, Sofia
%S Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Teaching Natural Language Processing (TeachNLP 2026)
%D 2026
%8 March
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Rabat, Morocco
%@ 979-8-89176-375-3
%F gautam-2026-teaching-critiquing
%X NLP researchers regularly invoke abstract concepts like “interpretability,” “bias,” “reasoning,” and “stereotypes,” without defining them.Each subfield has a shared understanding or conceptualization of what these terms mean and how we should treat them, and this shared understanding is the basis on which operational decisions are made:Datasets are built to evaluate these concepts, metrics are proposed to quantify them, and claims are made about systems. But what do they mean, what _should_ they mean, and how should we measure them?I outline a seminar I created for students to explore these questions of conceptualization and operationalization, with an interdisciplinary reading list and an emphasis on discussion and critique.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.teachingnlp-1.11/
%P 69-77
Markdown (Informal)
[Teaching and Critiquing Conceptualization and Operationalization in NLP](https://aclanthology.org/2026.teachingnlp-1.11/) (Gautam, TeachingNLP 2026)
ACL