@inproceedings{thompson-2026-amanamt,
title = "{A}mana{MT}: Translation Direction Predicts Automatic Metric Reliability",
author = "Thompson, Isaac",
editor = "Haddow, Barry and
Kocmi, Tom and
Koehn, Philipp and
Monz, Christof",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.42/",
pages = "747--764",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-474-3",
abstract = "When machine translation (MT) metrics fail in low-resource settings, the field typically blames data scarcity. We show this diagnosis is often wrong using AmanaMT, a unified benchmark spanning 730,748 segments, 33 languages, three annotation tiers, and 10 metrics: the dominant predictor of metric unreliability is not resource level but domain mismatch and translation direction. Direction is the single largest predictor of between-language variance in metric reliability ({\ensuremath{\eta}}2dir = 0.309, nearly a third of between-language variance); morphological type is a substantially smaller main effect ({\ensuremath{\eta}}2morph = 0.073), though the joint direction{\texttimes}morphology cells account for {\ensuremath{\eta}}2cell = 0.618, capturing direction-specific morphological variation. Ukrainian{'}s near-zero COMET correlation is fully explained by a domain label (other, not news): a genre confound, not a language problem. Russian{'}s weak aggregate dissolves into clean per-year signals once stratified by WMT year, a textbook Simpson{'}s Paradox from pooling heterogeneous system generations. Neural metrics (MetricX-24, xCOMET, COMET) substantially outperform n-gram baselines at every tier; the gap is largest in morphologically complex and non-news settings where surface overlap is an especially poor proxy for adequacy."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="thompson-2026-amanamt">
<titleInfo>
<title>AmanaMT: Translation Direction Predicts Automatic Metric Reliability</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Isaac</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Thompson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Barry</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Haddow</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tom</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kocmi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philipp</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Koehn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christof</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Monz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-474-3</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>When machine translation (MT) metrics fail in low-resource settings, the field typically blames data scarcity. We show this diagnosis is often wrong using AmanaMT, a unified benchmark spanning 730,748 segments, 33 languages, three annotation tiers, and 10 metrics: the dominant predictor of metric unreliability is not resource level but domain mismatch and translation direction. Direction is the single largest predictor of between-language variance in metric reliability (\ensuremathη2dir = 0.309, nearly a third of between-language variance); morphological type is a substantially smaller main effect (\ensuremathη2morph = 0.073), though the joint direction×morphology cells account for \ensuremathη2cell = 0.618, capturing direction-specific morphological variation. Ukrainian’s near-zero COMET correlation is fully explained by a domain label (other, not news): a genre confound, not a language problem. Russian’s weak aggregate dissolves into clean per-year signals once stratified by WMT year, a textbook Simpson’s Paradox from pooling heterogeneous system generations. Neural metrics (MetricX-24, xCOMET, COMET) substantially outperform n-gram baselines at every tier; the gap is largest in morphologically complex and non-news settings where surface overlap is an especially poor proxy for adequacy.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">thompson-2026-amanamt</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.42/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>747</start>
<end>764</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T AmanaMT: Translation Direction Predicts Automatic Metric Reliability
%A Thompson, Isaac
%Y Haddow, Barry
%Y Kocmi, Tom
%Y Koehn, Philipp
%Y Monz, Christof
%S Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-474-3
%F thompson-2026-amanamt
%X When machine translation (MT) metrics fail in low-resource settings, the field typically blames data scarcity. We show this diagnosis is often wrong using AmanaMT, a unified benchmark spanning 730,748 segments, 33 languages, three annotation tiers, and 10 metrics: the dominant predictor of metric unreliability is not resource level but domain mismatch and translation direction. Direction is the single largest predictor of between-language variance in metric reliability (\ensuremathη2dir = 0.309, nearly a third of between-language variance); morphological type is a substantially smaller main effect (\ensuremathη2morph = 0.073), though the joint direction×morphology cells account for \ensuremathη2cell = 0.618, capturing direction-specific morphological variation. Ukrainian’s near-zero COMET correlation is fully explained by a domain label (other, not news): a genre confound, not a language problem. Russian’s weak aggregate dissolves into clean per-year signals once stratified by WMT year, a textbook Simpson’s Paradox from pooling heterogeneous system generations. Neural metrics (MetricX-24, xCOMET, COMET) substantially outperform n-gram baselines at every tier; the gap is largest in morphologically complex and non-news settings where surface overlap is an especially poor proxy for adequacy.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.42/
%P 747-764
Markdown (Informal)
[AmanaMT: Translation Direction Predicts Automatic Metric Reliability](https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.42/) (Thompson, WMT 2026)
ACL