@inproceedings{lavie-etal-2026-findings,
title = "Findings of the {WMT}26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems: Compact Open Models are Competitive Quality Evaluators",
author = "Lavie, Alon and
Hanneman, Greg and
Perrella, Stefano and
Ding, Shuoyang and
Avramidis, Eleftherios and
Proietti, Lorenzo and
Lo, Chi-Kiu and
Shurtz, Ammon and
Zerva, Chrysoula and
Sindhujan, Archchana and
Zouhar, Vilem and
Kanojia, Diptesh and
Blain, Frederic and
Thompson, Brian and
Filandrianos, Giorgos and
Menis Mastromichalakis, Orfeas and
Kocmi, Tom and
Gupta, Pranav",
editor = "Haddow, Barry and
Kocmi, Tom and
Koehn, Philipp and
Monz, Christof",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.49/",
pages = "924--1023",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-474-3",
abstract = "We present the findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems, continuing last year{'}s unification of the earlier separate WMT Metrics and Quality Estimation shared tasks. This year we evaluated three complementary views of segment-level translation quality on a common test set: fine-grained error-span detection, continuous quality-score prediction, and a new task on identifying error-free translations. Submissions to upstream tasks were also converted automatically to downstream predictions. The evaluation covered 21 translation directions using human cESA judgments from the WMT26 General Machine Translation task, with optional reference translations generated as either native, post-edited, or pseudo-references, depending on the translation direction. Official evaluation data was complemented by five submitted challenge sets. Across all three primary tasks, unsupervised LLM-as-a-judge approaches outperformed all traditional and supervised metrics, while open-weight models such as Gemma 4 were found to be largely competitive with proprietary frontier models. Reference-free LLM judges are highly competitive, and the benefit of adding a reference largely depends on its provenance and on the evaluator model family."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="lavie-etal-2026-findings">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems: Compact Open Models are Competitive Quality Evaluators</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lavie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Greg</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hanneman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefano</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Perrella</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shuoyang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ding</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eleftherios</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Avramidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lorenzo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Proietti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chi-Kiu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lo</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ammon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shurtz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chrysoula</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zerva</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Archchana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sindhujan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vilem</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zouhar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diptesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kanojia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Frederic</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blain</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Brian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Thompson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giorgos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Filandrianos</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Orfeas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Menis Mastromichalakis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tom</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kocmi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pranav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gupta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Barry</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Haddow</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tom</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kocmi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philipp</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Koehn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christof</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Monz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-474-3</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>We present the findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems, continuing last year’s unification of the earlier separate WMT Metrics and Quality Estimation shared tasks. This year we evaluated three complementary views of segment-level translation quality on a common test set: fine-grained error-span detection, continuous quality-score prediction, and a new task on identifying error-free translations. Submissions to upstream tasks were also converted automatically to downstream predictions. The evaluation covered 21 translation directions using human cESA judgments from the WMT26 General Machine Translation task, with optional reference translations generated as either native, post-edited, or pseudo-references, depending on the translation direction. Official evaluation data was complemented by five submitted challenge sets. Across all three primary tasks, unsupervised LLM-as-a-judge approaches outperformed all traditional and supervised metrics, while open-weight models such as Gemma 4 were found to be largely competitive with proprietary frontier models. Reference-free LLM judges are highly competitive, and the benefit of adding a reference largely depends on its provenance and on the evaluator model family.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">lavie-etal-2026-findings</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.49/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>924</start>
<end>1023</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems: Compact Open Models are Competitive Quality Evaluators
%A Lavie, Alon
%A Hanneman, Greg
%A Perrella, Stefano
%A Ding, Shuoyang
%A Avramidis, Eleftherios
%A Proietti, Lorenzo
%A Lo, Chi-Kiu
%A Shurtz, Ammon
%A Zerva, Chrysoula
%A Sindhujan, Archchana
%A Zouhar, Vilem
%A Kanojia, Diptesh
%A Blain, Frederic
%A Thompson, Brian
%A Filandrianos, Giorgos
%A Menis Mastromichalakis, Orfeas
%A Kocmi, Tom
%A Gupta, Pranav
%Y Haddow, Barry
%Y Kocmi, Tom
%Y Koehn, Philipp
%Y Monz, Christof
%S Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-474-3
%F lavie-etal-2026-findings
%X We present the findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems, continuing last year’s unification of the earlier separate WMT Metrics and Quality Estimation shared tasks. This year we evaluated three complementary views of segment-level translation quality on a common test set: fine-grained error-span detection, continuous quality-score prediction, and a new task on identifying error-free translations. Submissions to upstream tasks were also converted automatically to downstream predictions. The evaluation covered 21 translation directions using human cESA judgments from the WMT26 General Machine Translation task, with optional reference translations generated as either native, post-edited, or pseudo-references, depending on the translation direction. Official evaluation data was complemented by five submitted challenge sets. Across all three primary tasks, unsupervised LLM-as-a-judge approaches outperformed all traditional and supervised metrics, while open-weight models such as Gemma 4 were found to be largely competitive with proprietary frontier models. Reference-free LLM judges are highly competitive, and the benefit of adding a reference largely depends on its provenance and on the evaluator model family.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.49/
%P 924-1023
Markdown (Informal)
[Findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems: Compact Open Models are Competitive Quality Evaluators](https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.49/) (Lavie et al., WMT 2026)
ACL
- Alon Lavie, Greg Hanneman, Stefano Perrella, Shuoyang Ding, Eleftherios Avramidis, Lorenzo Proietti, Chi-Kiu Lo, Ammon Shurtz, Chrysoula Zerva, Archchana Sindhujan, Vilem Zouhar, Diptesh Kanojia, Frederic Blain, Brian Thompson, Giorgos Filandrianos, Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis, Tom Kocmi, and Pranav Gupta. 2026. Findings of the WMT26 Shared Task on Automated Translation Quality Evaluation Systems: Compact Open Models are Competitive Quality Evaluators. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation, pages 924–1023, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.