@inproceedings{kanojia-etal-2026-blind,
title = "In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for {MT} Evaluation",
author = "Kanojia, Diptesh and
Lo, Chi-Kiu and
Sindhujan, Archchana and
Larkin, Samuel and
Hanneman, Greg and
Lavie, Alon",
editor = "Haddow, Barry and
Kocmi, Tom and
Koehn, Philipp and
Monz, Christof",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation",
month = oct,
year = "2026",
address = "Budapest, Hungary",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.69/",
pages = "1284--1304",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-474-3",
abstract = "The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system{--}prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year{'}s WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="kanojia-etal-2026-blind">
<titleInfo>
<title>In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diptesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kanojia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chi-Kiu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lo</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Archchana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sindhujan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Samuel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Larkin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Greg</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hanneman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Alon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lavie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Barry</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Haddow</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tom</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kocmi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Philipp</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Koehn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christof</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Monz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Budapest, Hungary</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-474-3</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system–prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year’s WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">kanojia-etal-2026-blind</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.69/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1284</start>
<end>1304</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation
%A Kanojia, Diptesh
%A Lo, Chi-Kiu
%A Sindhujan, Archchana
%A Larkin, Samuel
%A Hanneman, Greg
%A Lavie, Alon
%Y Haddow, Barry
%Y Kocmi, Tom
%Y Koehn, Philipp
%Y Monz, Christof
%S Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation
%D 2026
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Budapest, Hungary
%@ 979-8-89176-474-3
%F kanojia-etal-2026-blind
%X The WMT26 General MT task evaluates systems on 10 language pairs that have no human references (neither translated from scratch nor post-edited from MT output by humans). We describe how we built the pseudo-references for these pairs and six other language pairs (in which some forms of human references are available): seven models translate the 3,277 official documents under up to five prompt conditions, giving a total of 26 system–prompt combinations; then three reference-free quality estimation (QE) models score every candidate; and a per-document selector picks one translation, which GPT-5.5 post-edits where needed. Working without references exposed a failure mode of QE-guided selection: the metrics rank fluent output in the wrong language above correct translations. Adding a confidence-scaled language identification penalty to the score fusion drives the wrong-language count to zero, and the resulting selector still scores better on MetricX than the rank-fusion baseline it replaces. Since no references were available for these pairs while we were building them, we calibrate every selection decision on last year’s WMT25 human judgments. The human evaluation, released after construction, shows the cost of getting selection wrong: our references stand with the strongest participating systems when the selector kept a frontier-model candidate, and fall up to 17 ESA points below them when it did not. We release the selection method and the provenance of every reference.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.69/
%P 1284-1304
Markdown (Informal)
[In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation](https://aclanthology.org/2026.wmt-main.69/) (Kanojia et al., WMT 2026)
ACL
- Diptesh Kanojia, Chi-Kiu Lo, Archchana Sindhujan, Samuel Larkin, Greg Hanneman, and Alon Lavie. 2026. In the Blind: Building Pseudo-References for MT Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Machine Translation, pages 1284–1304, Budapest, Hungary. Association for Computational Linguistics.