%0 Conference Proceedings %T Investigating the Role of Argumentation in the Rhetorical Analysis of Scientific Publications with Neural Multi-Task Learning Models %A Lauscher, Anne %A Glavaš, Goran %A Ponzetto, Simone Paolo %A Eckert, Kai %Y Riloff, Ellen %Y Chiang, David %Y Hockenmaier, Julia %Y Tsujii, Jun’ichi %S Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing %D 2018 %8 oct nov %I Association for Computational Linguistics %C Brussels, Belgium %F lauscher-etal-2018-investigating %X Exponential growth in the number of scientific publications yields the need for effective automatic analysis of rhetorical aspects of scientific writing. Acknowledging the argumentative nature of scientific text, in this work we investigate the link between the argumentative structure of scientific publications and rhetorical aspects such as discourse categories or citation contexts. To this end, we (1) augment a corpus of scientific publications annotated with four layers of rhetoric annotations with argumentation annotations and (2) investigate neural multi-task learning architectures combining argument extraction with a set of rhetorical classification tasks. By coupling rhetorical classifiers with the extraction of argumentative components in a joint multi-task learning setting, we obtain significant performance gains for different rhetorical analysis tasks. %R 10.18653/v1/D18-1370 %U https://aclanthology.org/D18-1370 %U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1370 %P 3326-3338