@inproceedings{dey-etal-2017-junlp,
title = "{JUNLP} at {IJCNLP}-2017 Task 3: A Rank Prediction Model for Review Opinion Diversification",
author = "Dey, Monalisa and
Mondal, Anupam and
Das, Dipankar",
editor = "Liu, Chao-Hong and
Nakov, Preslav and
Xue, Nianwen",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the {IJCNLP} 2017, Shared Tasks",
month = dec,
year = "2017",
address = "Taipei, Taiwan",
publisher = "Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/I17-4023",
pages = "138--142",
abstract = {IJCNLP-17 Review Opinion Diversification (RevOpiD-2017) task has been designed for ranking the top-k reviews of a product from a set of reviews, which assists in identifying a summarized output to express the opinion of the entire review set. The task is divided into three independent subtasks as subtask-A,subtask-B, and subtask-C. Each of these three subtasks selects the top-k reviews based on helpfulness, representativeness, and exhaustiveness of the opinions expressed in the review set individually. In order to develop the modules and predict the rank of reviews for all three subtasks, we have employed two well-known supervised classifiers namely, Na{\"\i}ve Bayes and Logistic Regression on the top of several extracted features such as the number of nouns, number of verbs, and number of sentiment words etc from the provided datasets. Finally, the organizers have helped to validate the predicted outputs for all three subtasks by using their evaluation metrics. The metrics provide the scores of list size 5 as (0.80 (mth)) for subtask-A, (0.86 (cos), 0.87 (cos d), 0.71 (cpr), 4.98 (a-dcg), and 556.94 (wt)) for subtask B, and (10.94 (unwt) and 0.67 (recall)) for subtask C individually.},
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="dey-etal-2017-junlp">
<titleInfo>
<title>JUNLP at IJCNLP-2017 Task 3: A Rank Prediction Model for Review Opinion Diversification</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Monalisa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dey</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anupam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mondal</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dipankar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Das</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2017-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the IJCNLP 2017, Shared Tasks</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chao-Hong</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Liu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Preslav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Nakov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nianwen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xue</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Taipei, Taiwan</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>IJCNLP-17 Review Opinion Diversification (RevOpiD-2017) task has been designed for ranking the top-k reviews of a product from a set of reviews, which assists in identifying a summarized output to express the opinion of the entire review set. The task is divided into three independent subtasks as subtask-A,subtask-B, and subtask-C. Each of these three subtasks selects the top-k reviews based on helpfulness, representativeness, and exhaustiveness of the opinions expressed in the review set individually. In order to develop the modules and predict the rank of reviews for all three subtasks, we have employed two well-known supervised classifiers namely, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression on the top of several extracted features such as the number of nouns, number of verbs, and number of sentiment words etc from the provided datasets. Finally, the organizers have helped to validate the predicted outputs for all three subtasks by using their evaluation metrics. The metrics provide the scores of list size 5 as (0.80 (mth)) for subtask-A, (0.86 (cos), 0.87 (cos d), 0.71 (cpr), 4.98 (a-dcg), and 556.94 (wt)) for subtask B, and (10.94 (unwt) and 0.67 (recall)) for subtask C individually.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">dey-etal-2017-junlp</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/I17-4023</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2017-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>138</start>
<end>142</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T JUNLP at IJCNLP-2017 Task 3: A Rank Prediction Model for Review Opinion Diversification
%A Dey, Monalisa
%A Mondal, Anupam
%A Das, Dipankar
%Y Liu, Chao-Hong
%Y Nakov, Preslav
%Y Xue, Nianwen
%S Proceedings of the IJCNLP 2017, Shared Tasks
%D 2017
%8 December
%I Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing
%C Taipei, Taiwan
%F dey-etal-2017-junlp
%X IJCNLP-17 Review Opinion Diversification (RevOpiD-2017) task has been designed for ranking the top-k reviews of a product from a set of reviews, which assists in identifying a summarized output to express the opinion of the entire review set. The task is divided into three independent subtasks as subtask-A,subtask-B, and subtask-C. Each of these three subtasks selects the top-k reviews based on helpfulness, representativeness, and exhaustiveness of the opinions expressed in the review set individually. In order to develop the modules and predict the rank of reviews for all three subtasks, we have employed two well-known supervised classifiers namely, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression on the top of several extracted features such as the number of nouns, number of verbs, and number of sentiment words etc from the provided datasets. Finally, the organizers have helped to validate the predicted outputs for all three subtasks by using their evaluation metrics. The metrics provide the scores of list size 5 as (0.80 (mth)) for subtask-A, (0.86 (cos), 0.87 (cos d), 0.71 (cpr), 4.98 (a-dcg), and 556.94 (wt)) for subtask B, and (10.94 (unwt) and 0.67 (recall)) for subtask C individually.
%U https://aclanthology.org/I17-4023
%P 138-142
Markdown (Informal)
[JUNLP at IJCNLP-2017 Task 3: A Rank Prediction Model for Review Opinion Diversification](https://aclanthology.org/I17-4023) (Dey et al., IJCNLP 2017)
ACL