@inproceedings{vesela-etal-2004-annotators,
title = "Annotators{'} Agreement: The Case of Topic-Focus Articulation",
author = "Vesel{\'a}, Kate{\v{r}}ina and
Havelka, Ji{\v{r}}{\'\i} and
Haji{\v{c}}ov{\'a}, Eva",
editor = "Lino, Maria Teresa and
Xavier, Maria Francisca and
Ferreira, F{\'a}tima and
Costa, Rute and
Silva, Raquel",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation ({LREC}{'}04)",
month = may,
year = "2004",
address = "Lisbon, Portugal",
publisher = "European Language Resources Association (ELRA)",
url = "http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/350.pdf",
abstract = "The annotation of the Prague Dependency Treebank (PDT) is conceived of as a multilayered scenario that comprises also dependency representations (tectogrammatical tree structures, TGTS's) of the underlying structure of the sentences. TGTS's capture three basic aspects of the underlying structure of sentences: (a) the dependency tree structure, (b) the kinds of dependency syntactic relations, and (c) the basic characteristics of the topic-focus articulation (TFA). Since the PDT is a large collection and the annotations on the deepest layer are to a large extent performed by several human annotators (based on an automatic preprocessing module), it is more than necessary to observe the consistence of annotators and the agreement among them. In the present paper, we summarize the results of the evaluation of parallel annotations of several samples taken from PDT and the measures accepted to improve the consistency of annotations.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vesela-etal-2004-annotators">
<titleInfo>
<title>Annotators’ Agreement: The Case of Topic-Focus Articulation</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kateřina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Veselá</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jiří</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Havelka</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eva</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hajičová</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2004-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maria</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Teresa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lino</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maria</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Francisca</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xavier</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Fátima</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ferreira</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rute</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Costa</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Raquel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Silva</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>European Language Resources Association (ELRA)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Lisbon, Portugal</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The annotation of the Prague Dependency Treebank (PDT) is conceived of as a multilayered scenario that comprises also dependency representations (tectogrammatical tree structures, TGTS’s) of the underlying structure of the sentences. TGTS’s capture three basic aspects of the underlying structure of sentences: (a) the dependency tree structure, (b) the kinds of dependency syntactic relations, and (c) the basic characteristics of the topic-focus articulation (TFA). Since the PDT is a large collection and the annotations on the deepest layer are to a large extent performed by several human annotators (based on an automatic preprocessing module), it is more than necessary to observe the consistence of annotators and the agreement among them. In the present paper, we summarize the results of the evaluation of parallel annotations of several samples taken from PDT and the measures accepted to improve the consistency of annotations.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">vesela-etal-2004-annotators</identifier>
<location>
<url>http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/350.pdf</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2004-05</date>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Annotators’ Agreement: The Case of Topic-Focus Articulation
%A Veselá, Kateřina
%A Havelka, Jiří
%A Hajičová, Eva
%Y Lino, Maria Teresa
%Y Xavier, Maria Francisca
%Y Ferreira, Fátima
%Y Costa, Rute
%Y Silva, Raquel
%S Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’04)
%D 2004
%8 May
%I European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
%C Lisbon, Portugal
%F vesela-etal-2004-annotators
%X The annotation of the Prague Dependency Treebank (PDT) is conceived of as a multilayered scenario that comprises also dependency representations (tectogrammatical tree structures, TGTS’s) of the underlying structure of the sentences. TGTS’s capture three basic aspects of the underlying structure of sentences: (a) the dependency tree structure, (b) the kinds of dependency syntactic relations, and (c) the basic characteristics of the topic-focus articulation (TFA). Since the PDT is a large collection and the annotations on the deepest layer are to a large extent performed by several human annotators (based on an automatic preprocessing module), it is more than necessary to observe the consistence of annotators and the agreement among them. In the present paper, we summarize the results of the evaluation of parallel annotations of several samples taken from PDT and the measures accepted to improve the consistency of annotations.
%U http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/350.pdf
Markdown (Informal)
[Annotators’ Agreement: The Case of Topic-Focus Articulation](http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2004/pdf/350.pdf) (Veselá et al., LREC 2004)
ACL