<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="hardcastle-scott-2008-evaluate">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text?</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">David</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Hardcastle</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Donia</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Scott</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2008-05</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC‘08)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Nicoletta</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Calzolari</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Khalid</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Choukri</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Bente</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Maegaard</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Joseph</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Mariani</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Jan</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Odijk</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Stelios</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Piperidis</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Tapias</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>European Language Resources Association (ELRA)</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Marrakech, Morocco</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Evaluating the output of NLG systems is notoriously difficult, and performing assessments of text quality even more so. A range of automated and subject-based approaches to the evaluation of text quality have been taken, including comparison with a putative gold standard text, analysis of specific linguistic features of the output, expert review and task-based evaluation. In this paper we present the results of a variety of such approaches in the context of a case study application. We discuss the problems encountered in the implementation of each approach in the context of the literature, and propose that a test based on the Turing test for machine intelligence offers a way forward in the evaluation of the subjective notion of text quality.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">hardcastle-scott-2008-evaluate</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/L08-1392/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2008-05</date>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text?
%A Hardcastle, David
%A Scott, Donia
%Y Calzolari, Nicoletta
%Y Choukri, Khalid
%Y Maegaard, Bente
%Y Mariani, Joseph
%Y Odijk, Jan
%Y Piperidis, Stelios
%Y Tapias, Daniel
%S Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC‘08)
%D 2008
%8 May
%I European Language Resources Association (ELRA)
%C Marrakech, Morocco
%F hardcastle-scott-2008-evaluate
%X Evaluating the output of NLG systems is notoriously difficult, and performing assessments of text quality even more so. A range of automated and subject-based approaches to the evaluation of text quality have been taken, including comparison with a putative gold standard text, analysis of specific linguistic features of the output, expert review and task-based evaluation. In this paper we present the results of a variety of such approaches in the context of a case study application. We discuss the problems encountered in the implementation of each approach in the context of the literature, and propose that a test based on the Turing test for machine intelligence offers a way forward in the evaluation of the subjective notion of text quality.
%U https://aclanthology.org/L08-1392/

Markdown (Informal)

[Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text?](https://aclanthology.org/L08-1392/) (Hardcastle & Scott, LREC 2008)

• Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text? (Hardcastle & Scott, LREC 2008)

ACL

• David Hardcastle and Donia Scott. 2008. Can we Evaluate the Quality of Generated Text?. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech, Morocco. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).