@inproceedings{glenski-etal-2018-identifying,
title = "Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources",
author = "Glenski, Maria and
Weninger, Tim and
Volkova, Svitlana",
editor = "Gurevych, Iryna and
Miyao, Yusuke",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)",
month = jul,
year = "2018",
address = "Melbourne, Australia",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/P18-2029",
doi = "10.18653/v1/P18-2029",
pages = "176--181",
abstract = "In the age of social news, it is important to understand the types of reactions that are evoked from news sources with various levels of credibility. In the present work we seek to better understand how users react to trusted and deceptive news sources across two popular, and very different, social media platforms. To that end, (1) we develop a model to classify user reactions into one of nine types, such as answer, elaboration, and question, etc, and (2) we measure the speed and the type of reaction for trusted and deceptive news sources for 10.8M Twitter posts and 6.2M Reddit comments. We show that there are significant differences in the speed and the type of reactions between trusted and deceptive news sources on Twitter, but far smaller differences on Reddit.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="glenski-etal-2018-identifying">
<titleInfo>
<title>Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Glenski</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tim</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Weninger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Svitlana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Volkova</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Iryna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gurevych</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yusuke</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Miyao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Melbourne, Australia</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In the age of social news, it is important to understand the types of reactions that are evoked from news sources with various levels of credibility. In the present work we seek to better understand how users react to trusted and deceptive news sources across two popular, and very different, social media platforms. To that end, (1) we develop a model to classify user reactions into one of nine types, such as answer, elaboration, and question, etc, and (2) we measure the speed and the type of reaction for trusted and deceptive news sources for 10.8M Twitter posts and 6.2M Reddit comments. We show that there are significant differences in the speed and the type of reactions between trusted and deceptive news sources on Twitter, but far smaller differences on Reddit.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">glenski-etal-2018-identifying</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/P18-2029</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/P18-2029</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>176</start>
<end>181</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources
%A Glenski, Maria
%A Weninger, Tim
%A Volkova, Svitlana
%Y Gurevych, Iryna
%Y Miyao, Yusuke
%S Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
%D 2018
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Melbourne, Australia
%F glenski-etal-2018-identifying
%X In the age of social news, it is important to understand the types of reactions that are evoked from news sources with various levels of credibility. In the present work we seek to better understand how users react to trusted and deceptive news sources across two popular, and very different, social media platforms. To that end, (1) we develop a model to classify user reactions into one of nine types, such as answer, elaboration, and question, etc, and (2) we measure the speed and the type of reaction for trusted and deceptive news sources for 10.8M Twitter posts and 6.2M Reddit comments. We show that there are significant differences in the speed and the type of reactions between trusted and deceptive news sources on Twitter, but far smaller differences on Reddit.
%R 10.18653/v1/P18-2029
%U https://aclanthology.org/P18-2029
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-2029
%P 176-181
Markdown (Informal)
[Identifying and Understanding User Reactions to Deceptive and Trusted Social News Sources](https://aclanthology.org/P18-2029) (Glenski et al., ACL 2018)
ACL