@article{reddy-etal-2016-transforming,
title = "Transforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing",
author = {Reddy, Siva and
T{\"a}ckstr{\"o}m, Oscar and
Collins, Michael and
Kwiatkowski, Tom and
Das, Dipanjan and
Steedman, Mark and
Lapata, Mirella},
editor = "Lee, Lillian and
Johnson, Mark and
Toutanova, Kristina",
journal = "Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
volume = "4",
year = "2016",
address = "Cambridge, MA",
publisher = "MIT Press",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/Q16-1010",
doi = "10.1162/tacl_a_00088",
pages = "127--140",
abstract = "The strongly typed syntax of grammar formalisms such as CCG, TAG, LFG and HPSG offers a synchronous framework for deriving syntactic structures and semantic logical forms. In contrast{---}partly due to the lack of a strong type system{---}dependency structures are easy to annotate and have become a widely used form of syntactic analysis for many languages. However, the lack of a type system makes a formal mechanism for deriving logical forms from dependency structures challenging. We address this by introducing a robust system based on the lambda calculus for deriving neo-Davidsonian logical forms from dependency trees. These logical forms are then used for semantic parsing of natural language to Freebase. Experiments on the Free917 and Web-Questions datasets show that our representation is superior to the original dependency trees and that it outperforms a CCG-based representation on this task. Compared to prior work, we obtain the strongest result to date on Free917 and competitive results on WebQuestions.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="reddy-etal-2016-transforming">
<titleInfo>
<title>Transforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Siva</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reddy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Oscar</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Täckström</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Collins</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tom</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kwiatkowski</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dipanjan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Das</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mark</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Steedman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mirella</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lapata</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2016</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>MIT Press</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Cambridge, MA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The strongly typed syntax of grammar formalisms such as CCG, TAG, LFG and HPSG offers a synchronous framework for deriving syntactic structures and semantic logical forms. In contrast—partly due to the lack of a strong type system—dependency structures are easy to annotate and have become a widely used form of syntactic analysis for many languages. However, the lack of a type system makes a formal mechanism for deriving logical forms from dependency structures challenging. We address this by introducing a robust system based on the lambda calculus for deriving neo-Davidsonian logical forms from dependency trees. These logical forms are then used for semantic parsing of natural language to Freebase. Experiments on the Free917 and Web-Questions datasets show that our representation is superior to the original dependency trees and that it outperforms a CCG-based representation on this task. Compared to prior work, we obtain the strongest result to date on Free917 and competitive results on WebQuestions.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">reddy-etal-2016-transforming</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1162/tacl_a_00088</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/Q16-1010</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2016</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>4</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>127</start>
<end>140</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Transforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing
%A Reddy, Siva
%A Täckström, Oscar
%A Collins, Michael
%A Kwiatkowski, Tom
%A Das, Dipanjan
%A Steedman, Mark
%A Lapata, Mirella
%J Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2016
%V 4
%I MIT Press
%C Cambridge, MA
%F reddy-etal-2016-transforming
%X The strongly typed syntax of grammar formalisms such as CCG, TAG, LFG and HPSG offers a synchronous framework for deriving syntactic structures and semantic logical forms. In contrast—partly due to the lack of a strong type system—dependency structures are easy to annotate and have become a widely used form of syntactic analysis for many languages. However, the lack of a type system makes a formal mechanism for deriving logical forms from dependency structures challenging. We address this by introducing a robust system based on the lambda calculus for deriving neo-Davidsonian logical forms from dependency trees. These logical forms are then used for semantic parsing of natural language to Freebase. Experiments on the Free917 and Web-Questions datasets show that our representation is superior to the original dependency trees and that it outperforms a CCG-based representation on this task. Compared to prior work, we obtain the strongest result to date on Free917 and competitive results on WebQuestions.
%R 10.1162/tacl_a_00088
%U https://aclanthology.org/Q16-1010
%U https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00088
%P 127-140
Markdown (Informal)
[Transforming Dependency Structures to Logical Forms for Semantic Parsing](https://aclanthology.org/Q16-1010) (Reddy et al., TACL 2016)
ACL